She takes from the poor
And gives to the rich
Stupid Bitch!
I keep hearing on TV that there is no DOJ investigation into the Clinton foundation. What to believe?
An open and shut case All the evidence is there.
If their names were anything other than Clinton The Jig would be up andThere’d be hell to pay.
Some numbskull talking head was actually praising the clinton foundation earlier. Threw out some numbers of children it helped. Nobody on the panel had the wits to tell him if he got that stat from the clinton foundation the. There is no reason anyone should believe it.
Even more ridiculous, he tried to tie the issue graft in the clinton foundation to Trump’s tax return. And the rest of the panel let him get away with that idiocy as well
“a ‘slush fund’ that pays out far more in salaries and expenses to its officers and employees than it does for charitable ends”
Which is also the governmental model of charity.
Would you donate to a charity w/90% overhead?
That’s what you get when you have govt do it through taxation.
Most money goes to cover employees, their benefits, the buildings, and infrastructure. Hard to beat actual charities where they’re staffed by volunteers.
And don’t be fooled by the idea that social security is any different. The way they tend to report that is how the payroll taxes are going right out to the beneficiaries - but they don’t include the OPM and GSA side of the equation - where the budget for SS employees and buildings come from.
Preet Bharara is a Bobo appointee...case closed...
Hillary and Frank Giustra, left.
Hes a gold mining mogul......he facilitated the takeover of US uranium assets.... this billionaire received your tax dollars from Hillary's State Dept.
Canadian mining magnate Frank Giustra is one of the Clinton Foundations largest donors. Giustra's $100 million contributions go directly:
<><> (1) to the tax-exempt Clinton Foundation, and,
<><> (2) to the Canada-based "Clinton-Giustra Enterprise Partnership."
The "Clinton-Giustra Enterprise Partnership" in turn sends money to the Clinton Foundation......(according to Canadian tax records researched by "Clinton Cash" author Schweizer).
DATA Sources: Clinton Foundation, CGEP (Canada);
Canadian tax records; compiled by Alberto Cuadra and
Rosalind Helderman May 3 at 8:11 PM
ARTICLE LINK http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/wealthy-canadian-helps-fund-the-clinton-foundation/2015/05/03/f855ea22-f1ea-11e4-90bc-afe06f530791_graphic.html
============================================
The NY Times reported the "Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership" collected about $33 million US tax dollars from Hillary's State Dept between 2008 and 2013.....$25 million of which was passed back across the border to the US-based Clinton Foundation.
Giustra then pledged $100 million to the Foundation after Clinton helped him clinch the mega-bucks uranium deal.
ITEM---millions of dollars and 1,100 donors are shrouded in mystery in the Canadian Giustra/Clinton operation. The Clinton Foundation signed a memorandum of understanding with the Obama White House agreeing to reveal its contributors every year. The agreement stipulates that the Clinton Giustra Sustainable Growth Initiative (as the charity was then-known) is part of the Clinton Foundation and must follow the same protocols.
SURPRISE: It hasnt.
Caught w/ his pants down, Giustra/s backtracking like crazy---saying Canadas federal privacy law forbids the Canadian-registered Clinton charity, from revealing its donors.
A memo he provided news organs cites fiduciary obligations to its contributors and Canadas Personal Information Privacy and Electronic Disclosure Act. We are not allowed to disclose even to the Clinton Foundation the names of our donors, Giustra says.
However, Canadian tax and privacy law experts were dubious of the Clinton/Giustra claims. A former director knowledgeable about tax policy at Canada's Department of Finance, said he wasnt aware of any tax laws that would prevent the Clinton charity from releasing its donor names. " There's nothing that would preclude them from releasing donor names. It's entirely up to them."
Not “in reverse” of Robin Hood.
The sheriff of Nottingham abused government power to steal from those who worked and did things.
Clinton is the sheriff. It’s not reverse. We just don’t have a Robin Hood to protect us.
Hey, send me millions and I'll gladly spend 10-15% of it on 'worthy' causes, and have lots of fun with the remainder....just like Bill, Hill and the kid do.
She and her organization are more like the Doan brothers and the Harpe brothers of revolutionary War infamy.
That's a laugh... Comey and the boys couldn't make an open & shUt case regarding the mishandling of class ified information. What are the chances that they can make a case here? Right! The answer is ZERO!
Reverse Robin Hood! Reverse Robin Hood! Where's Jesse when you need him to start screaming about the culture of greed and taking from the poor to give to the rich?
It was a great gangster spoof movie, Sinatra plays Robbo a Damon Runyon type hood in Chicago who donates a huge amount of money to charity and soon gets caught up in the do good business. He forms a Foundation called the Robbo Foundation and launders some of his ill gotten loot into doing good things, like soup kitchens, free health clinics. Just about the exact opposite of what The Clinton Foundation does.
Needless to say the Clinton's ain't do gooders!!!!!!!!!!