Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

“Always Correct” Election Predictor Has Donald Trump Defeating Sickly Hillary 51% to 48%
Gateway Pundit ^ | 8-13-16 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 08/13/2016 4:20:32 PM PDT by MichelleWSC3

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
To: Dave W

I think you might want to consult with Al Gore on that matter....

Just saying....


61 posted on 08/13/2016 7:02:35 PM PDT by Popman (Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a reproach to any people. - Proverbs 14:34)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: atc23

Both campaigns seemed to think Romney was winning it. Their chosen venues for election night were one giveaway. I remember Michelle Obama giving a speech the night before, near tears, and talking about the Obama presidency in the past tense...as if there was no way they’d win.


62 posted on 08/13/2016 7:08:54 PM PDT by Mjreagan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

I think Trump should be an over the top solicitous gentlemen. Allow her to enter first, express concern for her physical health. Offer her a chair. I think that’s the way to treat the old bag. It will piss off the feminists and make normal people think he is polite and caring.


63 posted on 08/13/2016 7:30:16 PM PDT by Betty Jane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Zenjitsuman

Bush never came close to a 5% lead in either 2000 or 2004.


64 posted on 08/13/2016 7:58:31 PM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Zenjitsuman

Yep. I figure its about 5% of the vote too.


65 posted on 08/13/2016 8:05:38 PM PDT by Diggity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MichelleWSC3

Does this genius realize there are other names on the ballot that will lower those numbers?


66 posted on 08/13/2016 8:20:49 PM PDT by Finalapproach29er (luke 6:38)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichelleWSC3

The fact that a crook like Hillary Clinton is even competitive in a national election truly shows that we’re indeed a very sick society.


67 posted on 08/13/2016 9:26:22 PM PDT by IDontLikeToPayTaxes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Betty Jane

Just when you think Trump can’t go any lower — today, he was blatantly polite and gentlemanly. The man has no shame! (Channeling Hillarybots.)


68 posted on 08/13/2016 9:53:05 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

The nerve of that guy.


69 posted on 08/13/2016 9:55:20 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Pollard

What about 3rd party pull. Too slim a margin to overcome fraud and lost votes to 3rd party.


70 posted on 08/13/2016 9:56:41 PM PDT by No Socialist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: vannrox

If that occurs there will be rwii/cwii. And they know it.


71 posted on 08/13/2016 10:42:30 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Popman
That was an entirely different matter. That was a disputed vote count in 2000. Your comment involved merely conceding a race. If you meant Trump being involved in a vote dispute, then I agree with you.

But my first post stands. In a non disputed race, concession shows good manners and has no legal ramifications. There have been candidates who conceded a race on election night and they wake up the next morning to discover they won because of absentee votes. They still won the race because they got the most votes. Conceding the race is irrelevant.

In a disputed race with Trump, you may be correct, but hopefully doing the right thing and the truth still means something today, but we will see. Wish you well.

72 posted on 08/13/2016 10:42:44 PM PDT by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: atc23

Your tagline is 100% correct.


73 posted on 08/13/2016 10:42:57 PM PDT by BrianE ("Dead at 25 buried at 65 the average American" - Benjamin Franklin 1776)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

They would not be so nuts if they could win it by fraud.

White men decide this election.


74 posted on 08/13/2016 10:45:26 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Get Out The Vote


75 posted on 08/13/2016 11:30:54 PM PDT by Nifster (Ignore all polls. Get Out The Vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis

The left will go berserk and take to the street insisting that he is too deranged to govern. They simply are not capable of being defeated by Trump.


76 posted on 08/13/2016 11:46:20 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (I Love Bull Markets!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MichelleWSC3

Bogus. There are two other candidates in this race too and they’re going to draw more than 1% of the vote. up to 12% in worst case scenario. Anything above becomes a black swan event.


77 posted on 08/13/2016 11:56:43 PM PDT by Fhios (Progressives just don't know when to stop digging.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

See if you can be an election judge. You’ll at least get paid for it. Most require at least two judges from each party.


78 posted on 08/14/2016 5:28:06 AM PDT by bjorn14 (Woe to those who call good evil and evil good. Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: MichelleWSC3
Read the story in the Examiner that it links to:

"However, in an unusual move, Abramowitz is throwing his own model under the bus and suggesting that Clinton will win because Trump is so different from past presidential candidates and has such high unfavorability ratings that his election forecast basics can't be trusted."

Another nothing story predicting a Trump loss.

79 posted on 08/14/2016 6:28:54 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichelleWSC3

It would be nice if this were correct, but I don’t trust it at all. Statistical models like this one are unlikely to be as accurate during this election - for technical reasons that are not worth explaining.

Decent Americans need to do more than we’re doing to win this year. We need to volunteer in get-out-the-vote efforts. We need to volunteer as poll watchers. We need to volunteer on Trump phone banks. We need to talk with friends about the election so they have a perspective on Trump that doesn’t come from the mainstream media. Trump can win, but a whole lot more of us need to get involved to make sure this election is outside the margin of fraud.


80 posted on 08/14/2016 7:05:51 AM PDT by Pollster1 (Somebody who agrees with me 80% of the time is a friend and ally, not a 20% traitor. - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson