[commish]

This is all well and good, but it is just hearsay and will have no legs without concrete proof — IE cached pages or saved pages showing the polling sites on Hillary’s web site differed from the State announced polling sites. Without that proof this is nothing more than an internet rumor, no matter how juicy or believable.

[Hostage]

The reason it is posted here is not to drive a conspiracy frenzy. It has a means of confirmation as briefly outlined in post #31.

FR is well-known to have some crack-sleuths who can get to the bottom of a worthy story quickly. We will see if anyone can come up with the gold.

[Pearls Before Swine]

If true, this is truly Stalinesque. But, the operation of this scheme requires the co-ordination of many, many people who also have to be trusted to remain silent. There's the staffers of the fake sites, who would have to know that they hadn't received the proper certifications for what they were doing; the ballot collectors, who replaced Bernie votes with Hillary votes and handled the rosters; the people who created the unauthorized ballots, etc, etc.

That's a lot of co-ordination and a lot of loyalty. Most Dems aren't that disciplined.