Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: reaganaut1

I think this is a great idea—your salary history is none of a new or prospective employer’s business. You are negotiating your future salary, not explaining your past salary. Fantastic.


8 posted on 08/11/2016 6:24:06 AM PDT by Reno89519 (It is very simple, Trump/Pence or Clinton/Kaine. Good riddance Lyn' Ted, we regret ever knowing you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Reno89519

Exactly right.

Every business has to trust its employees to maintain certain information confidential, and the best way to demonstrate the importance of this is by respecting the confidentiality of a prospective employees salary history. Let them be the judge of whether or not to accept an offer.

Besides, the company should establish the value of a job based on industry norms without regard to any one individual.


28 posted on 08/11/2016 6:43:58 AM PDT by bigbob (The Hillary indictment will have to come from us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Reno89519

I have BEGGED my state legislators to introduce some kind of fig-leaf of protection to job applicants when things are to the point that an employer can force you to answer any number of things that are none of their d@mn business.

This is a good law and I am glad to see it passed.


31 posted on 08/11/2016 6:49:13 AM PDT by Laser_Ray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Reno89519

I think the concept is great, but the idea that this is something that requires government intervention is a pathetic demonstration of nanny-state paternalism.


43 posted on 08/11/2016 7:05:57 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Sometimes I feel like I've been tied to the whipping post.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson