Not only was she rightly suspended she should never have been hired for that job in the first place. Employees don’t get to set company policy and good people couldn’t care less for her filthy, murderous religion.
So cheers, beyaatch!
If it were my company everyone would be required to eat a bacon sandwich at the job interview.
But Mr Hammere, are you saying that I can be ORDERED to serve someone when I am running my own company, but that it is OK for me to refuse to serve something I disagree with when I am accepting money from someone to work for their company?
Good Grief .. don’t these personnel offices know that you have to screen these people .. ask them if they have an issue about serving alcohol .. if they find out it’s a condition of employment; it might stop this type of reaction.
EEOC can’t stop an employer from asking if the person can do the job; and if there are parts of the job the person doesn’t want to do (for religious reasons) .. the employer has to decide how much of an accommodation will they be willing to make; and is it reasonable.
Being up front about it makes it easier for the employer and the employee to have a better relationship.
In this case, the employee is not being asked to DRINK the liquor .. just serve it to someone else. I would not consider this person’s request to not serve liquor as a reasonable request.
However, the only other answer is to place the person in another position where they would not have to serve liquor. However, it is probably a lower paying job.
Employer’s better know their EEOC laws .. it will keep them out of trouble.
"No, we don't need to know why you'd rather not serve bacon to the passengers.
Contrast with Christian businesses and the treatment they receive from that rat in Wasbington.
Stick her, Clock Boy and that Olympic bitch on a plane and fly them all out of the country.
She should have been fired.
More evidence that hiring plague victims is preferable to hiring Muslims.
Since she's all down with the sharia thingee, why doesn't she move to ISIS-Syria? Teh Boyz don't want no likker - but they certainly want your body, dearheart...
If I was one of the passengers she refused to serve, then I would be countering with claim - not against the airline but against her personally.
If you can be sued for not baking one type of cake then you can be sued for not pouring one type of drink.
another CAIR “Con Air Job”.
When is Congress or DOJ (Yeah, right) going to look into CAIR as both a RICO (criminal organization) and a terrorist/Sharia Law cover-upper?
Since they were an unindicted co-sonspirator in the Holy Land Fund case, that means there is serious evidence of their criminality.
Put them all under oath and let’s see what crawls out from the camel’s butt.
um... if you job is to serve alcohol... you cant refuse to serve alcohol.
DUH!
I’m going to go ahead and assume this FA just made it impossible for all muzzies to get a job in the airline business.
Great work. I hear they need slaves at the ISIS front lines and they have an opening for your opening you sue happy loser.
She knew what was required when she took the job.
She’s a plant. I have no doubt that she’s trying to use her position to get this country to capitulate to muslim demands through litigation.
If she doesn’t want to serve alcohol, then don’t take a job that you know it’s part of.
If a baker must bake cakes for a homosexual “wedding”, then Mohammedans must serve alcohol.
Discrimination is Discrimination is Discrimination.
Deportation is the answer.
Doubt if she has a case. When she applied for, and accepted, the job, she knew that serving booze is one of the primary duties. If she didn’t, then she’s so stupid she shouldn’t be working anywhere.
Could a teetotalling Christian get away with that? No.
If Christians must bake birthday cakes for homosexuals despite religious convictions, then this little so-and-so can serve alcohol or get gone.