The focus should be on Wikileaks, Assange, and Rich, not on any of the previous unproven mysterious deaths assigned to the Clintons.
Julian Assange mentioned Seth Rich for a reason and in the interview says that WL sources take risks (and used Rich’s death as an illustration of the risk), and because of the risk they honor their sources anonymity, yet Assange is pushing this because he probably wants to see some justice in the world of risks.
PS...more importantly Assange is an extremely credible source that can’t be ignored.
Well, she did ask. AND there is a definite history to back up his claims, even though the reporter thwarted his chance to actually say it. On purpose, maybe?