[yoe]

1) Complaint fails to state a cause of action
2) Hillary has qualified immunity as a gov't employee chief of State Dept.
3) Defendant deny she said......
4) Acts of Defendant did not cause injury
5) Injury was caused by acts of 3rd parties over which Hillary had no......

If we play by the "Hillary Rules" the judge can nail her......other wise...

The FBI did not do their duty.

[Boogieman]

The only one I see in your list that might apply is qualified immunity, and that can easily be suspended, especially if the government wants to maintain that they never told Hillary the incident was caused by a youtube video. If they didn’t tell her that, then she “went rogue” and qualified immunity shouldn’t be applicable.