Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FDA bans e-cigarette sales to minors starting today
cbs ^ | August 8, 2016, | DENNIS THOMPSON

Posted on 08/08/2016 12:06:45 PM PDT by Drango

The sale of e-cigarettes to minors will be banned starting Monday, as part of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's long-awaited plan to extend the agency's regulatory powers across all tobacco products.

The new rules halt the sale of e-cigarettes and any other tobacco product to anyone younger than 18.

The regulations also require photo IDs to buy e-cigarettes, and ban retailers from handing out free samples or selling them in all-ages vending machines.

The rules also cover other alternative forms of tobacco like cigars, hookah tobacco and pipe tobacco.

Electronic cigarettes are battery-operated devices designed to create an aerosol that delivers nicotine, flavor and other chemicals when inhaled by the user. Manufacturers have marketed the products as a way to help smokers quit cigarettes. But, opponents contend that the nicotine-laden e-cigarettes actually encourage people -- especially vulnerable teens -- to pick up the smoking habit.

"This final rule is a foundational step that enables the FDA to regulate products young people were using at alarming rates, like e-cigarettes, cigars and hookah tobacco, which had gone largely unregulated," Mitch Zeller, director of the FDA Center for Tobacco Products, said during a media briefing when the oversight was announced in May.

The FDA action earned universal praise from medical associations, which have been concerned that e-cigarettes serve as a gateway drug to draw teenagers into a lifetime of smoking addiction.

"Youth use e-cigarettes more than any other tobacco product on the market today, serving as an entry point to more traditional tobacco products and placing kids at risk to the harms and addiction of nicotine and other tobacco products," Harold Wimmer, national president and CEO of the American Lung Association, said in May. "Ending the tobacco epidemic is more urgent than ever, and can only happen if the FDA acts aggressively and broadly to protect all Americans from all tobacco products."

E-cigarette manufacturers also will not be allowed to promote the devices as a healthy alternative to smoking, unless they provide strong scientific evidence that supports the claim, Zeller said.

Studies have shown that as many as 70 percent of current adult e-cigarette users also continue to smoke tobacco cigarettes, and may be using the devices to flout indoor clean air laws, Zeller said.

Until now, e-cigarettes and other alternative tobacco products have gone unregulated by the FDA, despite a 2009 law that granted the agency the authority to govern any tobacco sold in the United States.

Children sickened as e-cigarette poisonings increase Manufacturers of e-cigarettes also will be required to submit new and existing products to the FDA for review and evaluation, unless the product was sold prior to Feb. 15, 2007.

That grandfathering date means that 99 percent of all e-cigarette and "vaping" products now on the market will have to be submitted for FDA review, according to a statement by the Smoke-Free Alternatives Trade Association, an e-cigarette trade group.

The FDA anticipates that existing e-cigarette brands will have at least three more regulation-free years on the market -- two years while manufacturers prepare their product application and another year for FDA review.

"The FDA is providing regulated entities with time to comply with these regulations," said FDA Commissioner Dr. Robert Califf.

E-cigarette trade associations condemned the new regulations.

The Smoke-Free Alternatives Trade Association stated in May: "Today's final rule pulls the rug out from the 9 million smokers who have switched to vaping, putting them in jeopardy of returning back to smoking, which kills 480,000 Americans each year and costs the U.S. more than $300 billion in annual health care expenses. These new regulations create an enormously cost-prohibitive regulatory process for manufacturers to market their products to adult smokers and vapers," crippling a "multi-billion job-creating industry."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ecigs; ecigsban; fda; fdaecigs; nicotine; nicotineban; pufflist; smoking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
The rules also cover other alternative forms of tobacco like cigars, hookah tobacco and pipe tobacco.

Congress needs to tax RYO tobacco just like any other tobacco product.

1 posted on 08/08/2016 12:06:46 PM PDT by Drango
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Drango

Congress needs to tax RYO tobacco just like any other tobacco product....UMMM, they already do. Just not quite as much.


2 posted on 08/08/2016 12:11:35 PM PDT by Safetgiver (Islam looks perversion look genteel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango

So kids hooked on tobacco products and are under 18 can’t use anything to help kick the habit. Nicotine tabs before and now this.


3 posted on 08/08/2016 12:12:01 PM PDT by SkyDancer ("They Say That Nobody's Perfect But Yet Here I Am")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango

Did Congress pass this law, or did FDA just decide to make up a new regulation?


4 posted on 08/08/2016 12:13:26 PM PDT by Oberon (John 12:5-6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango

Both you, and the tobacco lobby, will celebrate this wildly. It is very important to get people addicted to cigarettes early, and denying them a non-addictive alternative will go a long way towards your goal of pimping death and destruction. Much like the rest of Europe did in denying Snus (like ecigs, a harmless alternative to smoking) to non-Swedish countries.

Good for you (and all others who like seeing others suffer early, horrible deaths). Bad for everyone else, but good for you.


5 posted on 08/08/2016 12:13:51 PM PDT by jjsheridan5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango

I never understood why our rulers didn’t want e-cigs. Now I see.... more control and taxes.


6 posted on 08/08/2016 12:15:05 PM PDT by ColdOne (poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11~First woman nominated to be Prez, Valerie Jarrett, not Hillary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jjsheridan5
It is very important to get people addicted to cigarettes early

Your words not mine.

7 posted on 08/08/2016 12:16:10 PM PDT by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Drango

So you need a photo ID to purchase their products? Where are those screaming that such a requirement places an undue burden on minorities and women?


8 posted on 08/08/2016 12:16:21 PM PDT by Grams A (The Sun will rise in the East in the morning and God is still on his throne.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango

I was unaware that there were any states that allowed those under 18 to purchase tobacco or nicotine products.


9 posted on 08/08/2016 12:16:53 PM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango

Good. These things are nothing more than a drug delivery mechanism for the drug nicotine.


10 posted on 08/08/2016 12:17:31 PM PDT by bigbob (The Hillary indictment will have to come from us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango

My words, to describe you, and what is clearly your agenda. You clearly want kids to become addicted to cigarettes early, and are adamant that anything that can successfully keep them from becoming addicted must be denied to them. I don’t know your motive. You could be a paid lobbyist for the tobacco companies (or the pharmaceutical companies, or for the alphabet soup of “public interest” groups who ride the tobacco money gravy train). Or, you could just be one of those sick, malevolent, people who just enjoy seeing others suffer.

But yes, my words. To describe you.


11 posted on 08/08/2016 12:20:09 PM PDT by jjsheridan5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Drango

http://www.rttnews.com/1343406/candy-cigarettes-officially-banned-by-fda.aspx


12 posted on 08/08/2016 12:20:21 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango

Commie ‘RAT libs like to “ban” stuff.


13 posted on 08/08/2016 12:21:47 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Let's Make Our Government and Founding Documents Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oberon

Did Congress pass this law, or did FDA just decide to make up a new regulation?

...

According to the article the law was passed in 2009. The FDA is just now putting it into force.


14 posted on 08/08/2016 12:22:14 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Drango

The government hive mind has spoken.


15 posted on 08/08/2016 12:22:58 PM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin (Hillary Clinton AKA The Potemkin Princess of the Potomac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jjsheridan5
You clearly want kids to become addicted to cigarettes early

DANG! You've stumbled on a winning issue. Go with it. Till now smokers have lost the war on smoking, but this, this insight from you, could turn it all around. You're brilliant.

16 posted on 08/08/2016 12:24:41 PM PDT by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

Good. These things are nothing more than a drug delivery mechanism for the drug nicotine.

...

It’s also an alternative for tobacco addicts. I know someone whose health improved quite a bit by switching to vapor.


17 posted on 08/08/2016 12:24:58 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Drango

Phillip Morris and big pharm were the pushers of this bill.

wonder why?


18 posted on 08/08/2016 12:25:01 PM PDT by Bubba Gump Shrimp (A Liberal is someone who cannot accept that there is a Law of Unintended Consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango
may be using the devices to flout indoor clean air laws

They are NOT "flouting" a clean air law. They are OBEYING a clean air law.
19 posted on 08/08/2016 12:27:47 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There's no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Gump Shrimp

It was a bill?


20 posted on 08/08/2016 12:34:17 PM PDT by ExGeeEye (For dark is the suede that mows like a harvest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson