Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pravious

Well, Trump for one clearly believed that he did because he is back on offense and recalibrating on issues that actually matter to the American people. The situation is still very fluid and unknowable, it could be anywhere from a dead point to 10 points or more ahead, so best not to expend any more capital on dead end controversies that only blossom a as part of a larger discussion of Trump’s temperament. Although granted this was not nearly as egregious as the Mexican judge conflict so he should also be able to rise above it much more smoothly.


42 posted on 08/07/2016 1:32:09 PM PDT by erlayman (yw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: erlayman
not nearly as egregious as the Mexican judge conflict

Was it an egregious error to you or are you just repeating the MSM tripe?

He said the Judge might be biased because he is Mexican and hates the wall idea. What about that is not true? Judge are all biased otherwise we would always have 9-0 votes in the Supreme Court and democrats would not judge shop every trumped up issue.

66 posted on 08/07/2016 3:45:01 PM PDT by itsahoot (Trump kills PC--Hillary kills USA--Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson