To: DesertRhino
It’s not a fighter and assigning fighter metrics to it is folly of the ignorant.
48 posted on
08/05/2016 8:46:41 PM PDT by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
To: Mariner
Its not a fighter and assigning fighter metrics to it is folly of the ignorant.True. Against a modern air force, it is intended to fly under the umbrella provided by the F22. So while it is designed to be a multitask fighter(bomber), there is still need for some specialization.
I wonder how the F35 or A-10 would do against the latest Russian MPADS?
56 posted on
08/05/2016 9:08:14 PM PDT by
Jeff Chandler
(Everywhere is freaks and hairies Dykes and fairies, tell me where is sanity?)
To: Mariner
then WHY the F designation???
"If we're still planning for dog fights with the naked eye, everyone else in the whole world will eat our lunch."
and since our ROE are limited to visual confirmation, well...
62 posted on
08/05/2016 9:28:49 PM PDT by
Chode
(You Owe Them Nothing - Not Respect, Not Loyalty, Not Obedience, NOTHING!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson