I don’t decline to state where Obama was born. My posting history demonstrates that I’ve readily identified his birth location.
At present, I’m more interested in the fact that you dodge every question I ask. You are so convinced Obama was born in HI, facts and evidence appear to be non-issues.
Here is a minor fact, but one I hope you will address. Obama sent a letter to Kapiolani, thanking them for being the hospital of his birth. They displayed the letter, and used it for fundraising with excellent results.
Then they were informed that fundraising off the claim Obama was born there was fraud, UNLESS Obama in fact was born there.
Immediately the letter was removed from display, literally locked up beyond the public’s purview, and never again did Kapiolani fundraise off the claim of being Obama’s birth hospital.
My question to you is, why? Why, if Obama was born there, should they not use that fact to their advantage? Why pretend the letter never happened, the moment they were called on it?
While we’re at it, why did Abercrombie tell a close friend, the same day he searched, that HI had no birth certificate on file for Obama? Why, when called on it, did Abercrombie use the weasel words that ‘something was actually written down,’ as opposed to saying, ‘Of course Obama’s birth certificate is on file, right where it’s supposed to be.’?
Why?
Bonus question: why was the file STOLEN from the National Archives that documented all foreign arrivals, via airline, to HI for the week including Aug 4, 1961? Why is that the ONLY file that was stolen?
Optional trivia question: why did Obama say he was born in Asia?
Find a real claim to think about, a claim with evidence to support it.