“But it’s the Republican candidate who would have banned him. And it’s Newt Gingrich who would deport him immediately. That’s his concern. And certainly no reason for him to back Trump.”
Wrong and wrong.
Trump has called for vetting before allowing legal immigration. That is not a ban. Gingrich supports banning Sharia-supporters on the basis that Sharia is incompatible with America.
Khan is not backing Trump because it would affect his income from importing Muslims and spreading Sharia. But Khan he doesn’t say this does he? He’s simply exploiting his son’s death to protect his profits. He’s deceitful, crass and selfish. Ergo, the typical Democrat.
Right and right.
Trump has called for vetting before allowing legal immigration. That is not a ban. Gingrich supports banning Sharia-supporters on the basis that Sharia is incompatible with America.
Trump has taken half a dozen different positions on this, but let's take his mildest - extreme vetting for immigrants from all countries with terrorism problems. Without knowing what criteria Trump would use it's impossible to say that Khan and his family would have been allowed in. But I think it's safe to say that very few Muslims would be allowed to immigrate under a Trump administration. And with all the posts claiming Khan is a Muslim Brotherhood supporter I highly doubt he would make the cut. So Khan père still had a point, from the Democrat stance.
Khan is not backing Trump because it would affect his income from importing Muslims and spreading Sharia.
Yeah, keep telling yourself that.