Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fatal crash of Chinese J-15 carrier jet puts question mark over troubled programme
South China Morning Post ^ | Wednesday, 27 July, 2016 | Choi Chi-yuk

Posted on 07/29/2016 7:18:30 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

Mainland state media confirmed for the first time yesterday that a home-grown, carrier-based J-15 jet fighter crashed during training in April.

The crash could deal a blow to the development of the fighter jet and cast a shadow over the PLA Navy’s blue sea strategy and aircraft carrier programme.

J-15s are the core jet fighters for the mainland’s aircraft carrier, the Liaoning, and other more advanced domestic carriers reportedly under construction.

At the critical moment, Zhang tried his best to save the aircraft. When the pushrods failed, he ejected and died as a result of an injury on landingCNR REPORT China National Radio reported yesterday that a top-class PLA J-15 pilot died after he lost control of his plane during a simulated deck landing exercise at a unspecified inland base.

“When Zhang Chao was flying a carrier-based jet fighter in a mock landing on an aircraft carrier on April 27, he encountered a breakdown with the fly-by-wire flight control system,” the report said. “At the critical moment, Zhang tried his best to save the aircraft. When the pushrods failed, he ejected and died as a result of an injury on landing.” New practise flights from Liaoning for J-15 fighter

Macau-based military expert Antony Wong Dong warned that the fatal accident might indicate that the J-15 was not of high enough standard for an aircraft carrier, which would be a major disappointment to the navy.

The reason behind the crash of the J-15 could either be a failure in the flight control system or a problem with production quality

MILITARY EXPERT ANTONY WONG DONG

“As was with case with accidents during trial flights of the Su-27s in the 1980s, the reason behind the crash of the J-15 could either be a failure in the flight control system or a problem with production quality,” Wong said.

Canada-based Kanwa Defence Review reported in January that the programme for the development of the J-15 was well behind the demands of the navy, with the aircraft’s maker, Shenyang Aircraft Corporation, managing to deliver no more than 10 of the planes between 2012 and 2015.

China's Liaoning aircraft carrier completes test-landing of jets

Some military observer suggested that the People’s Liberation Army might reconsider its commitment to the J-15, but Wong said he thought the reverse might be the case. “As there is no alternative in sight, I think the Chinese military will not abandon its plan but be forced to go on building J-15s,” Wong said.

The state radio report said Zhang, a 29-year-old Hunan native, had just been promoted as a full battalion ranking lieutenant commander this month.

The defence ministry said late last year that it was building its second aircraft carrier, the first to be made in China.It would adopt the same ski-jump take-off design that analysts said would suit J-15 jets.

Analysts had expected the carrier to be ready for use by 2020.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Japan; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; carrier; china; j15
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: grey_whiskers

If the report is referring to the jet’s fly-by-wire control system, that seems highly improbable. Fly-by-wire systems, like that used on the F-16 and various Airbus airliners, are triple-redundant systems and highly reliable—they have to be, since they are making inputs literally by the second.

On the other hand, I wonder if the J-15 was outfitted with some sort of automatic landing system that was being tested at the time of the crash. Development of that technology would be a logical step for the PLAN; the U.S. has had that sort of system for almost 60 years.


21 posted on 07/29/2016 8:58:16 PM PDT by ExNewsExSpook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MarchonDC09122009

Won Hung Lo.


22 posted on 07/29/2016 9:06:18 PM PDT by jmacusa ("Dats all I can stands 'cuz I can't stands no more!''-- Popeye The Sailorman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ExNewsExSpook

Our prototypes also crashed, and we corrected, unfortunately the Chinese will also correct until they get it right.


23 posted on 07/29/2016 9:25:27 PM PDT by cpdiii (DECKHAND ROUGHNECK MUDMAN GEOLOGIST PILOT PHARMACIST LIBERTARIAN , CONSTITUTION IS WORTH DYING FOR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry
I bet they didn't use hardened pushrods on their solid cam engines.
The push rods might have been too long and the valves were hitting the pistons.

They really need to advance to jet engines.

24 posted on 07/29/2016 9:29:17 PM PDT by lewislynn (Ryan is the other half of the reason Romney got creamed by a negro with a Nobel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

RIP, Lt. Cmdr Zhang Chao.


25 posted on 07/29/2016 9:49:30 PM PDT by jumpingcholla34 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

Best laugh today! Thank you!


26 posted on 07/29/2016 9:54:19 PM PDT by stillfree? (My My My)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: pingman
Other than what appears to be fixed wings, you’re right. Where COULD they have gotten the plans?

From Hillary's private server.

27 posted on 07/30/2016 6:19:55 AM PDT by Know et al ( Keep on Freepin'!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: pingman

From Russia. It’s a knock off of the Soviet designed and Russian operated Sukhoi Su-33


28 posted on 08/01/2016 1:51:55 PM PDT by rmlew ("Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson