[Lent]

"So for that reason we're just going to remain silent and retreat as the world rots away all around us? Just how much stuff are we supposed to accept as the Marxist "iron laws of history" unfold? If conservatism isn't standing up to these "iron laws" and fighting ideas such as homosexual "marriage," then what in blazes is it? Is everything money and the economy to you?"

You want to be a prophet go down the streets and preach to the masses. Rent a tent like the guy you fawned over, the hypocrite Ted Cruz. The moral fakeman. This is a guy you supported who wasn't even a man of his word. But I digress.

Also, the whole "he was a man of his time" argument is used by the Left to excuse cultural moral degradation.

No. It's called not thinking ahistorically. Don't try to impute something to him unless you can presume to think for him at this time. You're welcome to do it but if you think that's a "conservative" methodology you're wrong.

[Zionist Conspirator]

You want to be a prophet go down the streets and preach to the masses. Rent a tent like the guy you fawned over, the hypocrite Ted Cruz. The moral fakeman. This is a guy you supported who wasn't even a man of his word. But I digress.

So what is this fight all about then? Free enterprise? Guns? Social Darwinism? Is that all you're in this for? And if Ted Cruz is a hypocrite, then what are people like you?

No. It's called not thinking ahistorically. Don't try to impute something to him unless you can presume to think for him at this time. You're welcome to do it but if you think that's a "conservative" methodology you're wrong.

"Thinking ahistorically" means taking account of A-mighty G-d and His will. If you dismiss Him you're just a time-bound little materialist who belongs in eighteenth century France.