In typical fashion, the LIBTARDS and other members of the Democratic Party will use this as a further excuse to enact more "gun control." The reality is that the police cannot be everywhere. Those police are already targets themselves from real homegrown GHETTO terrorists that have no allegiance to Islam. At least so far. The nanny state will seek to unilaterally DISARM the populace and when that fails to stop both terrorism and local crime, they will push for more police and more public and private surveillance until we really ARE a Police State.
That means folks, the American populace is in much the same situation as we were at the very beginning of the nation in the late 1700's. We are responsible for our own security. The purpose for uniformed police is traffic enforcement, local crime deterrence to the extent that it can be done and to keep families safe from each other. Otherwise, it's to clean up after a citizen has put a bad guy or terrorist into the Big Sleep.
These bastards just want to kill so badly in the name of their unholy god that they will use anything. Just wait until some are more established in our society with better weapons. It will get much uglier.
Good post, excellent comment.
Kitchen knives have replaced Guns.
The weapons were the knife and a short-handled hatchet, which has been widely mischaracterized as an ax. The Islamic State would quickly claim credit for the attack, posting his video on its Amaq news agency website.
Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/world/article92169982.html#storylink=cpy
Immediately the film Johnny Mnemonic came to mind ...
“You lo-techs will regret this!”
That's not going to happen.
And to borrow from another thread, what will stop a future tyrannical administration from using that policy on other groups that object to it?
Yes, good post and good comment.
And it doesn’t matter one bit whether terrorist attacks are high-tech or low-tech, that’s not the problem. The problem is the terrorists and their beliefs.