Posted on 07/26/2016 5:29:59 PM PDT by detective
The first 57 seconds of James O’Keefe’s latest undercover video interview, of a Clinton delegate from California, confirms what many have long suspected: Hillary Clinton’s real goal of complete and total confiscation of all firearms from every American citizen is being hidden behind benign and persuasive phrases such as “common sense gun control” and “protect our families,” etc.
It also reveals what happens when the “useful idiot” in the video learns that she has been exposed for what she is: a mouthpiece for the movement to disarm America and ultimately turn it into a totalitarian state.
Most importantly it reveals just how closely the Clinton campaign is following Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals in its attempt to install a totalitarian government (impossible without total gun confiscation) in the United States.
(Excerpt) Read more at thenewamerican.com ...
...Clinton wants to confiscate guns from law abiding citizens...
That plan didn’t work out so well for King George III all the way from Lexington to Yorktown. It won’t work out any better now. Tyrants never change. Neither do American gum owners attitudes.
...Clinton wants to confiscate guns from law abiding citizens...
That plan didn’t work out so well for King George III all the way from Lexington to Yorktown. It won’t work out any better now. Tyrants never change. Neither do American gum owners attitudes.
I can still put 5 shots into a 2" circle at 100 yards with iron sights, pretty good for an old guy.
No knock warrants. The military, street by street.
Then, the real bloodbath begins.
She has spoken of Trump using the military and the IRS against his enemies. This is projection.
If she loses, or even if not, I believe 0bama will give the go signal against the economy and us.
That’s what I’m talking about. Thanks for your service, PRO!
Seems a confiscation would get the reaction needed to declare martial law. They own the news; it will be very easy to paint Americans as domestic insurgents. Most sheeple will chug it down.
This vile woman (i use that word loosely) is a traitorous POS
if she think she can do away with the 2nd.
The cities will burn.
If Clintoon becomes our Potus, she will disarm us and make us like the poor guy below, running for his life! His crime, being a Trump supporter in San Jose earlier this year. He was run down by a Somali Islamic. The worthless Liberal San Jose Mayor and LaRaza police chief made sure their cops didn’t stop the violence against Trump supporters.
‘Rats want guns to kill others. Conservatives need guns to defend themselves from ‘Rat predators.’(Paladin2)
You are not alone in seeing the need for a AR.
The fed. reserve banks won’t let them. There’s a debt to be serviced. If it was tried they’d be truly shocked at how fast the bottom drops out of their world. And no LE Agency will be stupid enough to enforce it. All their officers know their employer can’t cover the insurance costs. No one’s going to stick their neck out.
Note to the Vagina Candidate: Molon labe!
= = = = = = = = = = =
Molon labe!
I am rushing up on 77 and will arrive there approx 1 month before the election.
There was a time in my life I didn’t think I would see 30 mostly because of where I was and where I could be, then didn’t think I would see 50 because of my on the go damn near 24/7 working & drinking, now it looks like I won’t see 80 because the idiots in this country have went over the edge.
When heading in my direction, they better strike fast and often as I WILL defend myself. Period.
Whether it be false bravado or idiocy, I STILL TEND to ‘run towards’ a burning building or gunfire.
MOLON LABE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
“Clinton wants to confiscate guns from law abiding citizens and eliminate all 2nd amendment rights.”
One of the main reasons many of us are so angry with the so-called nevertrumpers and also the sulking Cruzers: but mainly the nominal Republicans, some even claiming to be conservatives.
The Kristols, Bushes, Romneys and the rest of them.
If they help Clinton pull this off, because Trump just isn’t good enough for them, there won’t be a “mulligan” for them in 2020.
And it won’t just result in the GOP going the way of the Whigs, though it will be comparable; if you know anything about American history, you know what I’m talking about.
We don’t need an undercover video to tell us that...
“Recently Australia managed to get away, or take away,
tens of thousands, millions, of handguns. In one year
they were all gone. Can we do that? If we can’t, why
can’t we?” an attendee at a New Hampshire campaign
event asked Clinton.
“I think it would be worth considering doing it on
the national level, if that could be arranged,” the
White House hopeful replied, embracing not only a
mandated national buyback program but getting rid
of handguns in the United States.
She will simply make civil disobedience easy to do.
All she is doing is helping Mr. Trump get elected.
Not really.
Civil disobedience will be very popular.
Hopefully this opens some eyes to what’s actually going on in America. I think most of us here have been well aware of the stakes for a long time.
They don’t need to overturn it. They just interpret it away a decision at a time. It will be arbitrary magazine limits, then ammo types, then caliber limits, etc. Just watch. The time will come when Americans will have to decide to either knuckle under or fight it out.
>>They own the news; it will be very easy to paint Americans as domestic insurgents.<<
It’s possible, but they’ll have to paint millions of folks.
This would be a losing proposition.
The police? The military?
Brother I work with hundreds of cops and not a one of them agrees that confiscation is a remotely good idea, one because we are all gun owners, have family that are gun owners and by and large hate the Demonrats. (There are cops in unions, but they don’t vote democrat).
And we are under no allusions that gun confiscation is not the hill we want to die on.
I have been a police officer for almost twenty years, have worked with hundreds of officers with different agencies including the Fed and NOT ONE, not even the most jackhole, gung-ho, jaded ROD (retired on duty) blue bag of polyester chit wanted to take citizens guns in some kind of confiscation.
The military? We really want to believe our military is some hive mind that cannot and will not say hell no? Our young officers would not disobey unconstitutional orders? When I was a young infantry soldier I was taught to hate communists and Iraqis, the Norks, but NEVER the American people. Never once was this even contemplated or discussed. Sure, I was a small cog in a huge machine, but to go to war against a people, you have to train your soldiers to hate them first.
Sorry, Hillary can talk about confiscation but its unworkable fantasy.
Everyone was convinced that Obama would do the same and in reality he created more gun owners than ever before and now, now we have concealed carry in every state of the union. That was not the case when he got into office. Landmark cases like Heller have stood.
That silly broad cannot undo all that by presidential fiat, no matter her her disarmed populace fantasy.
Not trying to mean CB, but this gun confiscation thing gets people so worked up that they start believing it as gospel.
Now to be fair, police executives should have one voice that says “Ain’t no way, ain’t no how, we are confiscating guns. Go to Hades DOJ, you don’t run us.”
Unfortunately with 18000 agencies, that’s a little tough. Its boon and foil, 18000 agencies makes it difficult for the fed to take them over, it also makes it harder to get one accord to take to DC.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.