Just because they're in charge does not mean that their authority is unlimited.
The judge is the ultimate authority in his courtroom. That is as it should be.
See the above.
In this instance to argue otherwise is to support the legitimization and promotion of a Black terrorist group in a court of law.
No, in this instance I'm saying the judge is a liar: there is no such "law" and that any such law, if it existed, would be null and void under the the first amendment. (He cites the Supreme Court, which is a federal court and whose authority is limited [like all other branches] by the Constitution which flatly prohibits the congress from making such a law; by citing the USSC he is implicitly asserting that it is a federal issue which it may not be. [See Amd 10 and 11.])
You poor thing.
You’re clueless.
Yes, the judge can be appealed. He will still run his courtroom by what he thinks is right.
That’s really got to drive you crazy. LMAO