Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MaxistheBest

I was surprised to see all 11 battleground states lumped together. If Trump is leading Hildabeast by 2 points in all, then he is leading her by much more than that in at least a handful. Trump doesn’t need all 11, he only needs 6-7 battleground states depending on which ones.

For instance, if you stripped out the voters from Colorado, Michigan and Nevada (these 3 states are on the outer edge of being battleground states, definitely not swing states), I’m thinking Trump’s numbers would go up in the states he is already doing better in,all of which are true swing states.


16 posted on 07/24/2016 10:48:36 AM PDT by MaxistheBest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MaxistheBest
When you don't like the results you change the test. Colorado, Nevada and Michigan are not swing states. Throw them out and in the swing states Trump is probably up by 3 in those swing states. Just like global warming data, don't like the past 18 years, throw those years out and round them to fit your assumption.

This poll says it is worst than the media arm, MSM, of the DNC want to publicly admit

27 posted on 07/24/2016 11:00:49 AM PDT by Kozy (new age haruspex)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: MaxistheBest

CO depends on whether Glenn can bring together all anti-Hillary voters. He is a Cruzer 100% for Trump...and of course, for himself.

Trumpsters who attack Cruzers make the work of the Glenns of the country very difficult.


51 posted on 07/24/2016 1:15:20 PM PDT by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson