He has to be at least 5%points ahead of the evil witch to bypass cheating by her demonic horde!!
Your post reminds me of someone who said, to paraphrase, that if it’s not close, they can’t cheat. Meaning that in a close election, the Democrats will be able to win through fraud and/or prevailing in the recount.
Why is it, that the Democrats always gain votes in a recount situation?
In the Minnesota Senate race in 2008, Norm Coleman had about a 700 razor thin margin on election night. After a long drawn out recount process, which got the Minnesota courts involved, Al Franken was declared the winner by about 300 votes.
Even in the Florida presidential recount of 2000, Al Gore gained quite a few new votes.
On election night, Bush was ahead in Florida by about 2,000 votes. After all the recount shenanigans and hanging chad counts we all fondly remember, Bush was finally allowed to be declared the winner by 537 votes. Even in losing, the Democrats gained about 1,500 votes in that recount process.
There have got to be better ways to conduct elections than we do. This business of finding a bag of uncounted ballots weeks after the election should not be legal, in my opinion.
How hard is it to conduct free and fair elections? How hard is it to mandate that a precinct needs to turn in their election ballots by a certain time on election night, and if they don’t, then election officials are in violation of the law?
How hard is it to write the laws, so that, if somebody has “misplaced” bags of ballots, and miraculously finds them in the trunk of someone’s car, that they are too late to be counted in any recount process????
Any thoughts, anyone/???