There is evidence to suggest that having vetted the transcript of his speech before Trump and his team he then removed the passage involving the endorsementNo, sorry, there is absolutely no evidence of that, and it's been shown to be false. Even Rush mentioned this here:
One of the crucial things here that we have now learned about this is that Trump knew what Cruz was gonna say. Right? That story has been reported, that Cruz’s speech was submitted. Cruz has said that the Trump people knew what he was gonna say. The Trump people say that they knew what Cruz was gonna say. And everybody involved let it happen.I'm sure the whack-a-doodles here will continue to deny it, and will post blurry photos of the teleprompter from Newt's speech, claiming those were from Cruz speech. But if you go back and watch the coverage BEFORE the speech, you will see the media saying that they got an advanced copty of the speech and it does not contain an endorsement (for example, one of the talking heads in the Fox panel said this about 10 minutes or so before the Cruz speech).
As I stated to you that was an irrelevant consideration whether such existed or not. He did not endorse Trump and every reputable analysis indicates same. Numerous of his own supporters have now turned their backs on him. He is a snake whose pride an arrogance eventually go the better of him.
You see what I noted there? I had already examined this subject so the premise of him being a liar and fraud is not dependant on blurry photos but his own actions.