What she proposes will fail in the first case taken to court. What she proposes is NOT in the current law. Her selective enforcement pledge has no teeth.
She lies when she says that the gun manufacturers have decided what is compliant and what is not. The LAW clearly spells out what is compliant and what is not.
Even still, I know of two gun dealers here in MA who have decided not to push it and are telling customers that after today, no sales of Ruger 556s or S&W Sport 5.56 rifles will be made. I wonder if this "directive" (i.e. nastily worded letter) has gone out to S&W and Ruger.
The whole thing is BS and will not stand.
As evidenced by your local dealer, there doesn’t have to be enforcement to result in compliance. Few are eager to risk not only their business but all of their net worth on a gamble that the state won’t come knocking and seize inventory as evidence.