Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Faith Presses On

“the particular construction of that line “

This is the fault with your standard.
Mere ‘construction’ is not a sufficient standard.
Not a lawyer or a specialist in the field. Would be amenable of course to authoritative legal correction.

Personal moral standards vary, I believe a dispassionate person would take the same view as I: “Close but no cigar.”

That leaves the competency of the vetting process toward a different standard: “what can the media do with a plagiarism claim?”.
I don’t think that standard can ever predominate. The media can ‘claim’ whatever it wants.


382 posted on 07/19/2016 8:38:21 AM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies ]


To: mrsmith

Okay, then, what are you basing your judgment on that you believe it isn’t plagiarism? My degree has a great deal to do with original writing, and avoiding the plagiarizing of the words and ideas of others.

In that, the specific construction of a thought IS very important.

There are so many different ways of saying very similar things. Melania’s line used the same construction and almost exactly the same words.

But this is nothing next to all the actual SERIOUS issues and scandals that are country is dealing with.


389 posted on 07/19/2016 9:08:19 AM PDT by Faith Presses On (Above all, politics should serve the Great Commission, "preparing the way for the Lord.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 382 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson