Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/17/2016 12:40:43 PM PDT by COBOL2Java
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: COBOL2Java

FELON? Yes. Yed, Then NO VOTE!!! PERIOD!!!!!


2 posted on 07/17/2016 12:44:55 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COBOL2Java
Felony conviction = loss of voter rights.

Should be forever.

If she is so interested in civic duty, she can pick up paper/trash off the streets, the beaches and in the parks.
My husband did that for quite a while. He hated to see parks and beaches look like pig sties.

3 posted on 07/17/2016 12:45:38 PM PDT by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COBOL2Java

While I understand where they’re coming from on this, I would MUCH rather have had them argue that the governor’s action constitute a pardon and all the felons now not only have voting rights restored, but gun ownership rights as well.

It would be much more illuminating to see liberals defend against that. Unfortunately, their current argument just seems petty - what, they’d be fine with it if the governor signed 200,000 pieces of paper?


4 posted on 07/17/2016 12:46:35 PM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COBOL2Java

I know of one person that this got registered to vote for Trump


5 posted on 07/17/2016 12:46:48 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COBOL2Java
forging checks to buy drugs

Sure, lets let such poor decision makers decide how our country is run and we are governed.

9 posted on 07/17/2016 12:53:00 PM PDT by bgill (From the CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COBOL2Java

“Gov. McAuliffe is entitled to disagree with the policies of the Virginia Constitution, but he is not entitled to nullify those he dislikes,” attorneys for GOP House Speaker William Howell, Senate Majority Leader Thomas Norment and other voters write in their lawsuit.


Excellent point, legally speaking.

But McAuliffe is a good Democrat, and sees what his big boss, Obama, does at the federal level. So he is inspired to do the same at the state level, to just issue an executive order, whether he has legal authority to do so or not. And then dare the courts to try and stop him.

Obama is setting a standard for Democrats all the way down the line, in any public office, to act lawlessly, if doing so results in advancing some liberal agenda.


10 posted on 07/17/2016 12:55:53 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COBOL2Java

You’ve either served your time or you haven’t. I’m not crazy about denying God given rights to those who’ve completed their legal obligations.


11 posted on 07/17/2016 12:59:35 PM PDT by goodwithagun (March 3, 2016: The date FReepers justified the "goodness" of Planned Parenthood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COBOL2Java
The 54-year-old who lives in Fairfax County had her voting rights restored in April by Gov. Terry McAuliffe after losing them in 1989 for forging checks to buy drugs. She has never seen the inside of a polling booth.

Let's see. 54 years old means she was born in 1962 and she was 18 in 1980. 18 year olds had the vote before that. So from 1980 to 1989 she never voted. Must not have been very important to her for her to skip several elections.

Or maybe the 'reporter' is simply lying.

I'll take curtain # 2, Alex.

12 posted on 07/17/2016 1:00:12 PM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COBOL2Java
I don't see a problem.

What's the difference between a felony and a misdemeanor ... all crime is crime, and when you've paid your price ... it's over and done with.

So too with guns.

13 posted on 07/17/2016 1:06:44 PM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true ... and it ticks people off)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COBOL2Java

The Rats are assuming that ex-felons will vote for Rats. I’m not so sure.


14 posted on 07/17/2016 1:23:25 PM PDT by Seruzawa (All those memories will be lost, like tears in rain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COBOL2Java

Felons will be allowed to vote, our corrupt courts will see to that.


19 posted on 07/17/2016 2:23:18 PM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COBOL2Java

It’s not every election that felons get a chance to vote for one of their own.


33 posted on 07/17/2016 4:32:54 PM PDT by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COBOL2Java

Why does it matter? Minnesota has a senator elected by felons. The illegality didn’t seem to matter.


41 posted on 07/17/2016 9:29:58 PM PDT by MrChips (Ad sapientiam pertinet aeternarum rerum cognitio intellectualis - St. Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson