Posted on 07/15/2016 9:32:14 AM PDT by CedarDave
WASHINGTON U.S. House Democrats are pushing back against a Tennessee Republicans request that Attorney General Hector Balderas consider criminal charges stemming from fetal tissue research at the University of New Mexico, while House Republicans renewed allegations Thursday that fetal tissue researchers and abortion clinics are also breaking federal law.
Last month, Rep. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., chairwoman of the House Select Committee on Infant Lives, wrote a letter to Balderas asking him to investigate whether the University of New Mexico and an Albuquerque abortion provider broke a state law when they transferred aborted fetuses for research.
This week, Democrats on the panel, led by Rep. Jan Schakowsky of Illinois, fired back at Blackburn in a letter to Balderas, denying any wrongdoing by the University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center and Southwestern Womens Options, an Albuquerque abortion provider.
Blackburn on Thursday released an 88-page interim report on the overall controversy with the Republican majoritys findings. Transferring or selling fetal tissue for profit is against federal law, but costs of the transfer can be recouped.
Tara Shaver of Protest ABQ said in a written statement. Democrats who believe that its okay to kill a baby in the womb up to the day of birth and then use their body parts for experimental research are the ones who have taken an extreme position.
(Excerpt) Read more at abqjournal.com ...
NM list PING!
I may not PING for all New Mexico articles. To see New Mexico articles by topic click here: New Mexico Topics
To see NM articles by keyword, click here: New Mexico Keywords
To see the NM Message Page, click here: New Mexico Messages
(The NM list is available on my FR homepage for anyone to use. Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from the list.)
(For ABQ Journal articles requiring a subscription, scroll down to the bottom of the page to view the article for free after answering a question or watching a short video commercial.)
Tons of dead baby parts are being ‘used’... there’s not way legitimate researchers are using TONS of dead babies.
Something doesn’t add up here.
Not sure where you find the reference to the volume (tons) of baby parts you mention. It’s not in the story. Is it in the Blackburn report?
Tons? Where does it say that?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.