Clinton’s Syrian refugees would come on top of the tens of thousands of refugees the U.S. already admits from Muslim countries.
Adding Clinton’s 65,000 Syrian refugees to the approximately 149,000 Muslim migrants the U.S. resettled on green cards in the course of one year, means that Clinton could permanently resettle roughly 214,000 Muslim migrants in her first year as President. If Clinton were to continue her Syrian refugee program throughout her Presidency, she could potentially resettle as many as 856,000 during her first term alone.
From BreitBart....
Wow, I thought CFR folks were supposed to be brilliant. It turns out that they are stupid as fence posts.
Okay. I get it. Joke’s over. Let me wake up now. The world cannot be this stupid, or expect me to be this stupid. I’m really lying in bed having a bad dream. It’ll all end when I wake up.
If we don’t let them keep coming in to Kill Us, the ones here already will start Killing us??
Did I get that right? This Clown belongs in GITMO!!
Like they aren’t a threat NOW???
Islam is a threat.
All muslims are religiously obligated to seek world domination of Islam.
All non-muslims must submit or die.
Mad Mo made it so.
We’ll just have to shoot it out with them.
I wonder just how tall is the wall around this guys house.I wonder if ryan had the same contractor.
Fine. Let’s get this out in the open and finish it. Smoke em out.
damn you Richard Haass, you and your ilk want to pretend that Muslims are so peace loving, full of the milk of human kindness..... but now you say if we don’t do what they want they will become “threatening” and dangerous to us .....
Your own words expose the dangerous dishonest fraud you and your CFR kind have been stealthily imposing upon America!!
Just another self-loathing Jew.
Pfft!
Spit!
Now there’s progressive, liberal logic for you; import more muslims and we’ll be safer...
Dipshit!
DEFUND/DISMANTLE CFR.
FUHaas
http://www.targetliberty.com/2016/03/trump-names-president-of-council-on.html
NEWER WORLD ORDER
In contrast to multipolarity — which involves several distinct poles or concentrations of power — a nonpolar international system is characterized by numerous centers with meaningful power.
In a multipolar system, no power dominates, or the system will become unipolar. Nor do concentrations of power revolve around two positions, or the system will become bipolar. Multipolar systems can be cooperative, even assuming the form of a concert of powers, in which a few major powers work together on setting the rules of the game and disciplining those who violate them. They can also be more competitive, revolving around a balance of power, or conflictual, when the balance breaks down.
Other entities deserving inclusion would be global media outlets (al Jazeera, the BBC, CNN), militias (Hamas, Hezbollah, the Mahdi Army, the Taliban), political parties, religious institutions and movements, terrorist organizations (al Qaeda), drug cartels…
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/04/the_age_of_nonpolarity.html
From what I understand rapists use this same logic to “calm” their victims.
Richard Haass
So he has three names: Dick, Ha, and Ass.
Ha. Ha. Ha.
From: http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/016364.html :
Below two percent Muslims are well-behaved citizens and cause little apparent trouble for the host society.
At two percent and three percent Muslims begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs.
From five percent on Muslims exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. They push for the introduction of halal (“clean” by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves—along with threats for failure to comply (United States, Switzerland, Sweden). At this point, Muslims work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, or Islamic law. (England, Netherlands, Philippines).
When Muslims reach 10 percent of the population, they increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions (Paris—car burning). Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats (Amsterdam, Denmark—Mohammed cartoons, murder of Theo van Gogh).
After reaching 20 percent of a population expect hair-trigger rioting, Jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue burning (Indonesia, Ethiopia).
After 40 percent you find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing militia warfare (Bosnia, Chad).
From 60 percent you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon and jizya, the tax placed on [conquered] infidels (Sudan, Albania).
After 80 percent, expect to find state-run ethnic cleansing and genocide (Syria, Egypt, UAE).