You falsely mischaracterize my position.
_______________________________________________________
I’m sorry you believe that way. I have gone back and re-read all your posts and my responses to them, I do not believe I have what you said wrong. Perhaps you don’t mean what you say but what you said is in writing. You should perhaps re-read and re-evaluate.
From my reading of your words you have assumed that the cop killed a criminal, a criminal that you believe was reaching for his gun after robbing a store to keep from getting caught, that is at least your implication.
It is me who says we don’t know and in this country when we don’t know we have a presumption of innocence not guilt as you have ascribed.
Your previous comment alleged that my position is Castile deserved to die due to matching the BOLO for the armed robber. I HAVE SAID NO SUCH THING. Now, being called on your b.s., you’re suddenly pretending to have been reflecting my actual position. This crap is getting very tiresome.
I strongly suggest you apply the presumption of innocence, that you sanctimoniously just brought up, to officer Yenez, unless and until you have solid evidence against him. You do not.