Where is it for the court to tell the state and the party how to run their primaries? More and more I think we see the judiciary running the country. We need a balance-maybe new judges that respect their role vis-a-vis the constitution, the executive, and the legislative branches.
"In any event, allowing Correll to vote as required by the National Rules and RPVs 16(f) Filing, which mandate that Virginia's delegates vote proportionally on the first ballot in accordance with the results of the primary election, will not result in the prejudice that Defendants fear. Indeed, Defendants acknowledge that, ''so long as the delegates are bound pursuant to the National Republican Rules and the RPVs decision [to allocate votes proportionally], no evil results in the Commonwealth." (Def.'s Resp. 18)"
Where is it for the state to tell the party how to run its primary?