Thank you!
The presidential nominating process that the country now uses was forced on us by the constitutionally undefined political parties and has little to do with the process that the Founding States had enumerated in the Constitution.
Article II, Section 1, Clause 2: Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.
12th Amendment: The Electors shall meet in their respective states, and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; ..."
Many patriots probably think that the presidential nomination processes of the political parties are constitutional only because they grew up with them.
The political parties exist to control 10th Amendment-protected state powers and uniquely associated state revenues that the corrupt feds have been stealing from the states for many generations.
Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States. Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added]. United States v. Butler, 1936.
Remember in November !
Patriots need to support Trump by also electing a new, state sovereignty-respecting Congress that will not only work within its constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers to support Trumps vision for making America great again for everybody, but will also put a stop to unconstitutional federal taxes and unconstitutional federal interference in state affairs.
Note that such a Congress will also probably be willing to fire state sovereignty-ignoring activist justices.
Congress has the power to remove a supreme court justice?