Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mechanicos

Isn’t this up to the party? It is a private entity - I don’t see how the courts have any jurisdiction over this.


23 posted on 07/11/2016 2:51:45 PM PDT by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing consequences of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: fuzzylogic

“Isn’t this up to the party?”
Yes, that is what the judge ruled.

There is also a state law that binds the delegates and he ruled that that state law is unconstitutional.
Not the Party rule that binds them.


55 posted on 07/11/2016 3:28:37 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: fuzzylogic

“Isn’t this up to the party? It is a private entity - I don’t see how the courts have any jurisdiction over this.”

I believe the ruling essentially said as much. All it said was that state law could not force the delegates to vote a certain way, but it did not speak to RNC rules. In other words, what really matters is what the rules committee — and possibly the entire 2400+ member delegation if they get a minority report out of committee — says about the issue.


92 posted on 07/11/2016 4:27:08 PM PDT by lquist1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson