Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mrsmith

Oh ok,....so let me see if I understand.

The judge isn’t interfering with the party rules, he’s saying that actual state law can’t trump political party (a private entity) rules?

Is that like saying if you start a private club or group, the state laws can’t subvert your club rules? I know I’m dumbing it down, but that’s the best way to understand it.

Is that right?


170 posted on 07/12/2016 10:07:20 AM PDT by DrewsMum (If they wanted a conservative, they'd vote for one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: DrewsMum

Oh ok,....so let me see if I understand.

The judge isn’t interfering with the party rules, he’s saying that actual state law can’t trump political party (a private entity) rules?

Is that like saying if you start a private club or group, the state laws can’t subvert your club rules? I know I’m dumbing it down, but that’s the best way to understand it.

Is that right?


Yup.


191 posted on 07/12/2016 3:55:52 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson