Read the letter he did indeed need to have either a valid drivers license, a state picture id(and you can’t drive a car with that which he was doing), or a passport.
It was your own source that said so.
No, what it says is that he must carry a government issued photo ID. A suspended driver's license is still a valid photo ID. He would also have had a school-issued picture ID, as he worked for the St. Paul public school system.
But again, I'm going to make you live up to your same standard of proof, which I've been meeting over and over again..... while you get by with innuendo.
Castile did have a suspended license in the past, and he was convicted of driving without a license multiple times. He apparently got caught on the treadmill: he would get cited for something small, couldn't pay the fine and had his license suspended. Then, he would get cited for driving while it was suspended.
An aside: this is also playing out in California, after they raised traffic fines to unreasonable levels, in an attempt to raise revenue. People can't pay the fine, they lose their license, and then they can't get to their job. So, they collect unemployment/welfare. It's a vicious cycle.
But, Castile paid all of his fines and his license was reinstated in January:
You really should check out your "facts" before posting. It makes you look like a fool.