Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Liz

How about class action lawsuit against Hillary and Bill?


30 posted on 07/03/2016 5:32:50 AM PDT by Engedi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Engedi
re: "How about class action lawsuit against Hillary and Bill?"

Yes something like the victims of their supporters' violence suing them (and Soros) using the doctrine of vicarious liability.

The SPLC used it against white supremacists' influence over others who committed violent crimes.

35 posted on 07/03/2016 5:41:47 AM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: Engedi

there are simpler, less costly means for ending the problem


36 posted on 07/03/2016 5:43:46 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;+12, 73, ....Opabinia can teach us a lot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: Engedi
Another avenue I've suggested is s provision in the Export Administration Regulations b/c U.S. sources indicate that the extensive DOJ probe was more focused on the possibility that Hillary's private server was used to protect messaging in which Secy Clinton allegedly discussed quid pro quo transactions with private donors to the Clinton Foundation in exchange for influence on U.S. policy.

There is an abundance of evidence to prove that she did this.

REALITY CHECK--A provision in the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) is intended to prevent the govt from co-opting United States citizens and companies ..... EAR proscribes using US citizens as instrumentalities to advance a foreign government's foreign policy.

This clearly describe Hillary's activities at the State Dept.

As a tax-paid govt employee, Hillary clearly used her tax-paid office for purely political reasons.......involving the interests of foreign countries.......particularly donors to the Clinton Foundation.

The Export Administration Regulations (EAR) apply to all "U.S. persons" (defined to include individuals and companies located in the United States and their foreign affiliates).

The provisions are intended to prevent United States citizens and companies being used as instrumentalities of a foreign government's foreign policy.

Offending persons are subject to the EAR law when their activities relate to the sale, purchase, or transfer of goods or services (including the sale of information) within the United States or between the United States and a foreign country.

This covers exports and imports, financing, forwarding and shipping, and certain other transactions that may take place wholly offshore.....and/or across the border.s with private donors to the Clinton Foundation in exchange for influence on U.S. policy.

38 posted on 07/03/2016 5:52:20 AM PDT by Liz (SAFE PLACE A liberal's mind. Nothing's there. Nothing penetrates it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson