Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ronnie raygun

Why not an invisible phone call rather than a visible meeting though?


23 posted on 07/03/2016 5:17:58 AM PDT by americas.best.days... ( I think we can now say that they are behind us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: americas.best.days...

I’ve been wondering the same. Why take any chance at all to be seen? Why not just call indeed?

It must have been part of a plan to be seen.


32 posted on 07/03/2016 5:36:11 AM PDT by Principled (...the Supreme Court of the United States favors some laws over others...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: americas.best.days...
" Why not an invisible phone call rather than a visible meeting though?"

Maybe it wasn't meant to be visible?

34 posted on 07/03/2016 5:39:09 AM PDT by I am Richard Brandon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: americas.best.days...
Why not an invisible phone call rather than a visible meeting though?

One or both of their phones may be wiretapped. Besides Lynch is probably duty bound to chronicle phone calls.

43 posted on 07/03/2016 6:13:06 AM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: americas.best.days...

“Why not an invisible phone call rather than a visible meeting though?”

Phone calls can be tapped and Billy Boy can say alot with his eyes and expression on his face to send his message home.

Bill and Hillary are at the top of a criminal enterprise.


47 posted on 07/03/2016 6:20:13 AM PDT by No Socialist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson