Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: agere_contra

I dont think we should put up with freemovement at all - it will become defacto - we can’t allow it to happen.


11 posted on 06/30/2016 4:18:29 AM PDT by UKrepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: UKrepublican

I hear you UK repub, and I agree. If it could be mitigated to free movement of labor rather than persons, then that wouldn’t be too bad, but free movement of persons is poisonous.

But 112/113 of the EEA allows free movement to be throttled way, way down. Lichtenstein has already invoked it: there’s no reason why an overcrowded UK (that was in the EEA) could also do so.

Moving to the EEA would also repeal CAP and the fisheries policy + also give the UK the ability to trade freely + maintain the passport on financial services.

And if the EEA move didn’t stop free movement, then it’s *really* easy to leave the EEA. We would lose access to the single market (and would want to arrange bilateral agreements like Switzerland) but we could do it.


15 posted on 06/30/2016 4:26:46 AM PDT by agere_contra (Hamas has dug miles of tunnels - but no bomb-shelters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson