Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/28/2016 1:56:47 PM PDT by Elderberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Elderberry
I should have read more of this before I posted it.

Pure garbage.

Sorry.

2 posted on 06/28/2016 2:01:07 PM PDT by Elderberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Elderberry

What did any of this have to do with
Texas?


5 posted on 06/28/2016 2:40:52 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Elderberry

The review is biased in that it claims that Judge haney used unscrupilous means to make decision. If Judge haney’s means were Unconstitutional would not the Supreme Court instead dismiss the case. Instead the Supreme Court stated that the lower Court judge Haney’s rulings stand. So in essence the federal Governments lawyers did some things that were not constitutional. correct me if I am wrong. The article is kinda of pointing a finger that the Judge was wrong - and that the judge supported a weak arguement. me thinks this article is trying to revise what was done so the case can be reheard by another set of judges that the Odumbo Administration will chose to get the verdict that it wants


6 posted on 06/28/2016 2:41:43 PM PDT by hondact200 (Lincoln Freed the Slaves. Obama Enslaves the Free. Trump 2016 - Make America Great Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson