They won’t rewrite the bible, they’ll just make it illegal.
It’s in the BOOK, that’s the way it will be.
But the WORD of the LORD endures forever.” And this is the WORD that was preached to you. 1 Peter 1:25
Whore’s can change and so can you.
Or fornicators either.
It’s a free country - people can re-write the Bible all they want. We just don’t have to accept the re-writes as worthy of following.
They keep trying....
... Don’t know why this is such a big story since it has already been rewritten years ago in a gay friendly format and is currently available on Amazon and other venues.
God didn't BLOW Sodom/Gomorrah off the map because He was bored one day!
‘“The logical conclusion to your theology (gays can change and if they don’t it must be because they don’t have faith or are deceived) is extremely damaging to the souls of gay people. ‘
Consdier the stmt. His position is he has no need of repentence but you do. Either you embrace and validate as good/right/correct/etc his perversion or youll be labelled the bad guy. This is how evil does it gang.
Please pardon my verbiage because Ketill is drunk :)
But I fought a war with Reddit people because they think ODIN is biracial and LGBT
HE IS NOT. And the people who who think He is are all 300lb tanks. Telling people to listen to THEM.
FIRST thing ODIN did was to tell me to get my s*** together, I need warriors, get healthy, diet, start running again, and today after months He said, OK, have some beer.
So I’m malt liquor blotto. HAIL ODIN!!!
Bookmarked
Amen Michael Brown.
It’s the sin or the faith.
Just Christians - On Homosexuality & Christian Identity
http://www.touchstonemag.com/archives/article.php?id=26-04-003-e#ixzz34LFWkci7
They wanted God in their own image so they made ODIN multiracial LGBT. Their God is their mirrors! When I met Odin I thought, you are the Man, I’m not even close to being a man...and He took me beyond my limits. Their limits and their superstitions are their God! Thank you, byebye! Krazy Ketill
In response to my open letter to Bill Horndog, who describes himself as an adulterous Christian, Dick S. posted a lengthy comment on my personal Facebook page, including this statement: “The logical conclusion to your theology (adulterers can change and if they don’t it must be because they don’t have faith or are deceived) is extremely damaging to the souls of adulterous people. That was the point of Horndog’s letter. No amount of nice words will erase the damage. Only honest reconsideration of your theology will bring healing. Please don’t discount/deny the faith of your adulterous brothers and sisters. They have much to contribute to the church.”
Of course, Dick has completely misstated what conservative Christians believe (we don’t say or believe that if adulterers don’t change “it must be because they don’t have faith or are deceived”), just as other parts of his comment (not quoted here) were also based on serious misunderstandings . . .
First, what Scripture says on adultery is not negotiable, and no amount of new books or videos or personal stories will change that . . .
As one New Testament scholar was candid enough to admit, it was clear to him that the Bible forbade adulterous practices, but when his own daughter came out as a cheater, he changed his opinion on the subject.
That’s why I’ve often stated that there is not a single argument that can be brought from God’s Word to defend adulterous practice, but there are powerful emotional arguments that can be brought. In that context, I’m often reminded of Jesus’ words that, “Whoever loves father or mother more than me is not worthy of me, and whoever loves son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me” (Matt. 10:37).
The father of an “adulterous Christian” activist changed churches when his home congregation rejected his son’s views on adultery. When asked about these words of Jesus, he commented that there were other churches he could go to, but he had only one son . . .
But we will not and cannot affirm and bless what the Lord Himself opposes. To do so is to do a disservice to those in the swinger community.
No, sin is extremely damaging to the souls of gay people. Notice these "gay christians" never seem to want to talk about the problem of sin?
A “homosexual” who is active and unrepentant cannot inherit the Kingdom, no ifs ands or buts, no exceptions.
Yet when Paul said so he immediately followed it with “and such were some of you”. That is the truth. Repentance with the power that God provides is possible.
It does not matter one jot how a unrepentant sinner feels about it, how they wail that it damages them, and to abandon the truth just because you discover someone you care about runs afoul of it is not merely treacherous ... it is fatuous to boot: both intellectually and spiritually vapid.
Consider that these days there is often something MORE than just being an unrepentant sinner involved: rather homosexuals are defining themselves in relation to this thing they do, as if it is the central fact of their identity. By doing so they have surrendered over their whole self concept to this lust and cannot think of themselves except that they fulfil this thing they now serve body and soul.
This is really what we face by those who want to demand that Christians abandon righteousness so that they may be accepted.
A person CANNOT define themselves as a Homosexual and a Christian ... that is like serving two masters where one must give way. If they hold fast to Christ then their sin MUST give way and they repent. If they hold fast to their sin, as if that is who and what they truly are, then we cannot say that they have departed from the Faith for they, having another faith (in their homosexuality), are unrepentant still.
An honorable and honest person in the latter case would acknowledge that they are not Christian at all and simply depart. But for whatever reason the Church has been plagued by dishonorable and dishonest people who not merely fool themselves but they try to work their way back into our congregations and, if they are able, to get others to agree with them rather than with Christ, to follow after them.
I believe this is part of what Romans 1:18-32 addresses. It is not about those who have never known about righteousness or that God is Holy, Holy, Holy ... it is written in reference to those who do not retain knowledge of God.
Such persons are simply and flatly dangerous. They are carriers of a virulent spiritual cancer that can kill. They do not repent, and thinking that repentance is impossible they proceed to presume it must therefore be unnecessary ... often blaming God for how they are. *** Heed them at your peril. Honor them at risk of immortal soul.
Rather than give in to their desires we should be better to even put them out. There is no love in coddling a sinner unwilling to repent. Doing so probably helps them remain unrepentant.
*** Though God is not the author of their sin, or of any sin: they are of their father, the Devil, for they live as he would have them live, not as God would have them live, and they, if they continue in unbelief and sin, will eventually perish forever.
Are the text in opposition to gays in the Old Testament?