Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why the Left Hates Referendums
Townhall.com ^ | June 28, 2016 | Dennis Prager

Posted on 06/28/2016 5:20:42 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 06/28/2016 5:20:43 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The left loves power, not people.

Dennis Prager used to say that the left's goal was "equality." He seems to have recovered from that illusion.

2 posted on 06/28/2016 5:24:00 AM PDT by Tax-chick ("Estos sufrimientos pasaran, y la esperanza una salida marcara." ~ Abp. Romero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“The left loves power, not people.

Repeat: The left loves power, not people.

If that is not understood, the left is not understood.”


3 posted on 06/28/2016 5:24:12 AM PDT by kosciusko51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The issue isn’t that the Left hates referendums. It is that this one didn’t go their way. They’d be happy with the results of a “revote” referendum if they could get one and they won.

After all, it is the Left that is pushing the “National Popular Vote Interstate Compact.” If you didn’t know please Google it. Under this arrangement, which has passed in a number of states, the states who are part of it would throw all of their electoral college votes to the candidate with the most votes nationally.

It would completely undo the whole electoral scheme, and give enormous power to the last cheating district standing. It would lead to an explosion in cheating in the voting process, and endless recounts. And, it would turn the Presidential election into a one-shot referendum.

You can bet that if this were passed, the Leftist governments of the states in the compact would only follow it when it was to their advantage. And, you can bet that this patently unconstituional arrangement would be ratified by the Supreme Court if Hillary gets a few judges appointed.


4 posted on 06/28/2016 5:28:05 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kosciusko51

Liberals cannot stand for the opposition to win.
When liberals lose, the opposition must be destroyed.
Then another referendum or election must be held.


5 posted on 06/28/2016 5:35:24 AM PDT by Sasparilla (Hillary for Prison 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The peasants are SO stupid, why even allow them a voice? They obviously don’t know what’s best for themselves.


6 posted on 06/28/2016 5:44:07 AM PDT by GT Vander (Life's priorities; God, Family, Country. Everything else is just details...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Brilliant article, in Prager’s concise and level-headed style.


7 posted on 06/28/2016 5:45:05 AM PDT by Always A Marine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Maine has 5 leftist referendums on the ballot this November. When they controlled the govt, they decried the use of referendums by the party out of power. Our mantra will be just vote no.


8 posted on 06/28/2016 5:45:20 AM PDT by Steven Scharf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Hitler, Stalin, Il Duce, Mao, Ho, Pol Pot...it’s happening right here right before our eyes. Whatever made us think it couldn’t?


9 posted on 06/28/2016 5:45:50 AM PDT by Spok ("What're you going to believe-me or your own eyes?" -Marx (Groucho))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Oddly enough, traditional Socialists HATE the EU. They see it as a Big Boys Bankers Capitalist Club that despises workers and their rights and sees the institution as anything BUT Internationalist.

For myself, meanwhile, with a Polish wife and a half-Polish son, this sort of thing is currently worrying me, even though I voted Leave...

'No more Polish vermin': Police investigating after laminated cards reading 'leave the EU go home scum' are posted through front doors

My wife has been a British citizen since 2000, but she has a definite Polish accent and speaks Polish to friends on her mobile phone.

Polish community centre is vandalised with graffiti

In the latter link - the Polish Cultural Centre in Hammersmith has been there since the 1960s, with never a hint of trouble. Something has changed.

10 posted on 06/28/2016 5:57:14 AM PDT by Da_Shrimp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
I did a search in Brainy.com quotes; which is my favorite site for quotes, but couldn't find the quote. Perhaps you meant these 2 quotes by Dennis Prager?

"The Left has always sought single, non-values-based explanations for human behavior."

"Socialism values equality more than liberty."

I found this quote also good

"Want to raise children who will be happy adults? Teach them not to whine."

11 posted on 06/28/2016 5:57:35 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him. He got them and now we have to pay the consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

They’re referenda.


12 posted on 06/28/2016 6:02:45 AM PDT by Lisbon1940 (No full-term Governors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Dennis sometimes awakens from his neocon slumber to recognize a valid point.

The late great Larry Auster used to describe Dennis as a confused liberal who inconsistently is attracted to conservative values while holding tightly to the liberal prejudices that work against them.


13 posted on 06/28/2016 6:25:34 AM PDT by Pelham (Obama, the most unAmerican President in history)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Beware, the tyranny of the majority.


14 posted on 06/28/2016 7:06:04 AM PDT by Phlap (REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Dennis Prager used to say that the left’s goal was “equality.”

You seem to have mis-understood what Prager was saying. The leftist goal of “equality” is one of egalitarianism - equality of results - I’ve heard Prager explain this several times, including recently. The left clearly then needs power to bring about this “equality”.

This is not the same as the conservative goal of equality - everyone equal under the law, but your “results” are completely in your hands, not the governments.


15 posted on 06/28/2016 7:15:10 AM PDT by safeasthebanks ("The most rewarding part, was when he gave me my money!" - Dr. Nick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lisbon1940

You wouldn’t think Townhall and Prager U would make that mistake


16 posted on 06/28/2016 7:36:40 AM PDT by csmusaret (Will remove Obama-Biden bumperstickers for $10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: safeasthebanks
The leftist goal of “equality” is one of egalitarianism - equality of results -

That is demonstrably not true. If their goal was equality of result, they would LIVE equality of result, by means such as choosing a "median" lifestyle. "Life simply, so others may simply live," and all that.

I’ve heard Prager explain this several times, including recently.

Then he is still deceived, contrary to his apparent enlightenment in this article.

17 posted on 06/28/2016 7:55:22 AM PDT by Tax-chick ("Estos sufrimientos pasaran, y la esperanza una salida marcara." ~ Abp. Romero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Pelham
David Horowitz, who really ought to know better, also sometimes falls into apparently believing the "equality" hokum.
18 posted on 06/28/2016 7:56:55 AM PDT by Tax-chick ("Estos sufrimientos pasaran, y la esperanza una salida marcara." ~ Abp. Romero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

” If their goal was equality of result, they would LIVE equality of result,”

It’s so cute that you actually believe that...

Have a nice day, Pollyanna.


19 posted on 06/28/2016 8:14:06 AM PDT by safeasthebanks ("The most rewarding part, was when he gave me my money!" - Dr. Nick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It’s something they thought through over 100 years ago. Today’s lefties/progressives are very much about power like the article says but there’s also theory behind it.

“Progressivism” was a theory wants to speed up the “evolution of society”. On it’s own society will keep improving (evolving) at a slow pace. But, if “the right people” are in control they can speed up the evolution by forcing people to do “the right things”. People will of course be against this - until they see the wonderful results. If we let people decide things (e.g. referendums) then “the right people” will not be able to speed along the evolution of society.


20 posted on 06/28/2016 8:15:36 AM PDT by LostPassword
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson