Reuters / Yahoo runs this little gem :
“The court’s decision on whether a Republican-backed 2013 Texas law placed an undue burden on women exercising their constitutional right to abortion “
Constitutional right, you say ?
Wapo does not name the Justices who betrayed us; but I bet I can name them correctly without looking...
Yeah, Yahoo seems to revel in living out on the lunatic fringe.
Oh, yes: emanating from a penumbra. That's where the most secure constitutional rights come from. Things that are clearly stated are just so much hot air.
Yep. They ignore amendments like the 2nd and then invent new ones.
“The court’s decision on whether a Republican-backed 2013 Texas law placed an undue burden on women exercising their constitutional right to abortion “
Constitutional right, you say ?
...
Thomas made an excellent statement in his dissent:
“The Court has simultaneously transformed judicially created rights like the right to abortion into preferred constitutional rights, while disfavoring many of the rights actually enumerated in the Constitution,” Thomas wrote. “But our Constitution renounces the notion that some constitutional rights are more equal than others. ... A law either infringes a constitutional right, or not; there is no room for the judiciary to invent tolerable degrees of encroachment. Unless the Court abides by one set of rules to adjudicate constitutional rights, it will continue reducing constitutional law to policy-driven value judgments until the last shreds of its legitimacy disappear.”
Are tattoo aficionados subject to undue burden pursuing their joy?