Posted on 06/26/2016 3:40:06 PM PDT by HomerBohn
Edited on 06/26/2016 3:58:16 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
How the media was able to ignore all the Clinton crime family bodies over the years in beyond understanding.
Now her supporters are able to say “old news, not important”. The liberal media should be in jail right beside Hillary.
The press was, at one time, furnishing the literate public with truthful and unbiased news coverage. Changing over to a biased, lying, Democrat propaganda machine has caused their readership to go down. Those of us who classify ourselves as Conservatives look upon those rags as worthless and we’re, by and large, responsible for their decline.
The voters who pull the Democrat lever still look at the unfunny comic strips, the horoscopes, the easy to complete crossword puzzles, the obituaries, and the plethora of advertisements they pay to have delivered to them. However, they are utterly dumbed down by the one-sided coverage of events.
Had the printed media fulfilled their obligation to provide truthful and unbiased reporting the Democrats would have tanked decades ago.
Of course the same thing goes for television. When a network has a lesbian doing one-sided reporting and grinning apes spouting the party line another mistake may take place next November. America can’t afford three mistakes in a row and possibly a fourth. The media apparently is ignorant of the fact that a completely fractured nation and economy will be of no use to them and Gannett, et al, will go down the drain they’ve been circling.
I’ve stated this before, Mr. Moderator, but it’s been my understanding that excerptions from MSN, et al, should be held to under 300 words. Has the rule changed.
As usual I don’t expect an answer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.