Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ripnbang

That makes no sense. Guns and cars have a use. Not vaccinating your kids does not. I can operate a vehicle or use a gun without hurting anyone, but if there are large numbers of un-vaccinated people, they present a threat to the health of others.


21 posted on 06/26/2016 1:46:37 PM PDT by Pining_4_TX (All those who were appointed to eternal life believed. Acts 13:48)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Pining_4_TX

Whether they have a use or not is immaterial. The argument is being made to take away your right to drive fossil fuel means of transportation and your right to own a firearm. You don’t support those but do support this one. I happen to support freedom based on research and careful consideration of my own circumstances. So,I take it you’re not for freedom to make decisions about what you want your children to have or not have after weighing the risks and taking into account the circumstances of how much exposure they may or may not have to different types of environments?


46 posted on 06/26/2016 2:04:39 PM PDT by ripnbang ("An armed man is a citizen, an unarmed man a subject)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: Pining_4_TX
if there are large numbers of un-vaccinated people, they present a threat to the health of others.

You carefully said "others" instead of "the vaccinated."

Why? Because being vaccinated doesn't protect the vaccinated, and you know it.

Therefore, you knowingly, deliberately said "others."

87 posted on 06/26/2016 2:48:17 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson