Trump’s Speech About Hillary Was Terrifyingly Effective (says liberal columnist)

Slate ^ | June 22 2016 | Michelle Goldberg

[Let's Roll]

Well, there is just so much terrifying Killary material to be effective with.

[patriotfury]

#1.Team Trump needs to find or use a handful of virulent anti American / anti capitalism quotes from Saul Alinsky.

#2.Then show or tie this exact ideological connection with Hillary Rodham Clinton quotes which dove tail.

#3.Place them into the exact same national adds, and thereby shed light and prove the Alinsky/Obama/Clintons agenda in powerful sequences!!!

[patriotfury]

Obama and Hillary were more than just friends with Alinsky.

Hillary was particularly close and personal with Alinsky.

There is much more than just a handful of incriminating personal letters.

They were up to real bad stuff at home and around the world.

[Dragonfly]

Enjoy!

http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user3303/imageroot/2016/06/21/20160622_hillary1.jpg

[Bob]

From the article:

...but Clinton’s Bosnia tale really was mostly made up...

Mostly made up??? What part of the story wasn't made up?

[butlerweave]

Hillary is back on the Bottle again ,well Bottles

[AFreeBird]

The truth usually is.

[Iron Munro]

[cymbeline]

“Trump is improving as a candidate”

I suppose so. He was interviewed on the NBC news this evening and was accused of saying some things that couldn’t be proved or appeared to be false. He admitted on some that they “might be true”.

I wondered why Trump would stretch the truth. Could he have done it to “dare” Hillary to question him on these subjects which are probably dangerous for her to even talk about?

I can’t wait for the debates!

[cymbeline]

“Trump is improving as a candidate”

I suppose so. He was interviewed on the NBC news this evening and was accused of saying some things that couldn’t be proved or appeared to be false. He admitted on some that they “might be true”.

I wondered why Trump would stretch the truth. Could he have done it to “dare” Hillary to question him on these subjects which are probably dangerous for her to even talk about?

I can’t wait for the debates!

[Nuc 1.1]

Trump needs to balance his reasoned attacks on the PIAPS with an emotionally moving vision of his future America. He needs to remember that a large number of voters are emotionally driven and thus needs to keep an emotional appeal as part of his campaign. BTW I loved his attack on the PIAPS. Well done.

[The_Media_never_lie]

Sigh!

[bboop]

He’s got to broaden his message to take out all the libs, though. I do not believe Hilary will be the candidate - she’ll graciously step aside at the Convention (hopefully in an orange jumpsuit) and Biden/ Liz will jump in to the rescue.

[OrioleFan]

The point is not that this is true; as political analyst David Gergen said on CNN, the speech was slanderous.

To me this sums up the Democraps response to everything Trump says about the Obamas and the Clintons. If it's true, how can it be slanderous.

[bert]

well, she did land in Bosnia

Unlike Ron Brown, she survived the flight