Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: factoryrat

That’s not entirely due to emissions. That’s also due to mandated safety devices and construction elements, which massively raise the weight of a car. Many small cars easily top 3000lbs today, whereas many in the 80s were close to 2000. That extra weight reduces fuel economy.


32 posted on 06/22/2016 11:39:16 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Spktyr

More like 4000lbs. with federally mandated crash steel.

The point that I’m driving home is that fuel economy takes a back seat to emissions in the US auto market.

I worked in the auto industry. Everybody knew that the deck was stacked against us.

The EPA made in no short terms that WE were not allowed to put small diesel passenger cars on the domestic market.

GM got away with it they are, well, “government motors”.

Ten years ago, I was involved in tests at Chrysler with small diesel engines in their vehicles across their entire line up.

The trials stopped when the EPA said we couldn’t sell them on the domestic market. Those engines were made by the same company that supplied engines to VW.


39 posted on 06/22/2016 12:19:43 PM PDT by factoryrat (We are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson