Posted on 06/20/2016 2:54:56 PM PDT by Biggirl
A more accurate measure of the increase in tariff rates attributable to Smoot-Hawley can be found in a study carried out by the U.S. Tariff Commission. This study calculated the ad valorem rates that would have prevailed on actual U.S. imports in 1928, if the Smoot-Hawley rates been in effect then. These rates were compared with the rates prevailing under the Tariff Act of 1922, known as the Fordney-McCumber Tariff. The results are reproduced in Table 1 for the broad product categories used in tariff schedules and for total dutiable imports.
Table 1
Tariffs Rates under Fordney-McCumber vs. Smoot-Hawley
Equivalent ad valorem rates
Product................Fordney-McCumber.......Smoot-Hawley
Chemicals...........................29.72%................36.09%
Earthenware and Glass.......48.71...................53.73
Metals..................................33.95..................35.08
Wood...................................24.78..................11.73
Sugar...................................67.85...................77.21
Tobacco...............................63.09...................64.78
Agricultural Products..........22.71..................35.07
Spirits and Wines................38.83.................. 47.44
Cotton Manufactures...........40.27..................46.42
Flax, Hemp, and Jute...........18.16..................19.14
Wool and Manufactures.......49.54..................59.83
Silk Manufactures................56.56..................59.13
Rayon Manufactures............52.33..................53.62
Paper and Books..................24.74..................26.06
Sundries...............................36.97................. 28.45
Total.....................................38.48................. 41.14
Source: U.S. Tariff Commission, The Tariff Review, July 1930, Table II, p. 196.
By this measure, Smoot-Hawley raised average tariff rates by about 2 ½ percentage points from the already high rates prevailing under the Fordney-McCumber Tariff of 1922.
The Legacy Lives On!
Mark’s Lost Dog & Cat Rescue Foundation
“Conservatism is the antidote to tyranny precisely because its principles are the founding principles.” --Mark Levin in Liberty and Tyranny
Welcome to “The Levin Lounge”… Step in and have a virtual FRink.
Welcome all, to the most FUN LIVE THREAD on FreeRepublic.com!
You can call Mark’s show: 1-877-381-3811
yHello! He's Here In The Non-Descript Building and In The Hidden Bunker! Patriots, grab a comfy seat around the fireplace, warm your bones, grab a copy of The US Constitution, and select from Mark's Books which are on the shelves; help yourself and follow along for the next 3 hours, while we all educate each other and set the call-in libtards straight about their idiocy and treason. Also, help yourself to the Cheeseburger/Fries and Milk Duds 'buffet' and non-alcoholic drinks which Mark's graciously provided. And don't feed Barney any of that stuff!
• SiriusXM Patriot Conservative Talk Radio
• WBAP-820am in Dallas-Ft Worth, TX
Biggirl does not guarantee any of the above links to work at any given time.:)=^..^=
Mark explains it ALL… and boy do we NEED him!!
Levin FRinks List:
In no particular order, these are the excuses I’ve heard the globalists give for Brexit-
-Remain didn’t present the case so the “common man” understood.
-The ballots were too confusing for the “common man” to understand.
-The “common man” doesn’t know what’s best for the UK.
- The Leave group made promises it cannot keep.
- White people are bad.
Nowhere in the msm did I see any, I mean ANY favorable response.
Figures. It's become par for the course.
Watching the live results last evening and listening to Skynews commentaries was interesting.
First, LEAVE leaps forward. Newsies are in panic mode — but London hasn’t reported, so there is still hope.
Then, REMAIN takes the lead. The newsies basically declare it over, after that initial whiff of LEAVE leading passed.
Then, the voting got in the range of 7 to 8 million and LEAVE retook the lead and kept it, even expanded it, as each new million was counted.
Newsies and pols they were interviewing were in meltdown mode. It sort of reminded me of the 2010 election when Blitzer said ‘the Democrats have taken a shellacking.’
LEAVE finished with about a 1.3 million lead over REMAIN.
I listened and read until I couldn’t keep my eyes open! Your analysis seems accurate , what a roller coaster.
It’s going to take time to implement. .I pray they don’t lose their spine...as Maggie would say...”don’t go wobbly”...meanwhile, Rule, Britannia!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.