To: naturalman1975
There really was something exceptional about our WWII fighting men. Some combination of personal strength, courage and durability came together about that time.
It wasn’t just our soldiers either. Our enemies were also both fierce and brilliant.
2 posted on
06/20/2016 1:34:16 PM PDT by
yarddog
(Romans 8:38-39, For I am persuaded.)
To: yarddog
Nations comprised of peoples were fighting for their own kith and kin. It is much easier to pull together as one nation and do what is necessary when it is comprised of one people and has one culture. I think the elites believe that watering Western nations down to multicultural cesspools will prevent this, but Rwanda and the Balkans demonstrated that it will just lead to smaller, more localized conflicts between different peoples. Every people needs its own homeland, and it will eventually fight to create one wherever it finds itself without one. Hence the Islamic no-go zones appearing all over Europe. Where peoples are too intermingled to allow this, one people will seek to dominate and assimilate or extinguish the others and create a homeland in that manner. Diversity isn't a nation's strength, it is its eventual undoing. Back to my point: the strength and drive of the WWII generation the world over was its distinct lack of diversity within each of the combatant nations.
3 posted on
06/20/2016 1:56:00 PM PDT by
Trod Upon
(Government employees and welfare recipients are both net tax consumers. Often for life.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson