Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bravo whiskey
Right and Fisher thought speed was “armour” for his battlecruisers in the RN in WW1. That went well.

Fleet Admiral David Beatty: ""There seems to be something wrong with our bloody ships today."

Yup.

Battle cruiser HMS Invincible blowing up at Jutland.

Battle cruiser HMS Indefatigable sinking at Jutland.

Battle cruiser HMS Queen Mary blowing up at Jutland.

WWII Italian navy also had that false concept. Think Cape Matapan

14 posted on 06/20/2016 8:58:39 AM PDT by Oatka (Beware of an old man in a profession where men usually die young.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Oatka
WWII Italian navy also had that false concept. Think Cape Matapan

Not really. Early interwar Italian cruisers were fast and lightly armoured, but that was a counter to French ship design. Specfically fast "super destroyers" with near cruiser sized guns. Now if "The Threat" is building fast unarmoured fauxcruisers, building fast real cruisers (if lightly armoured) is a reasonable counter.

And the Zaras lost at Mapatan were fast, but also the most heavily armoured of any nations's interwar cruisers (the Italians cheated), but against aircraft torpedoes, and battleship guns, neither speed or armour were effective

20 posted on 06/21/2016 10:19:04 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Rules are for the guidance of wise men and the blind obedience of fools - Solon, Lawmaker of Athens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson