Aha— So the club owner could have been armed at the bar which is her place of business. I would imagine that by extension she can transfer her right to carry to her guard employees and her other employees(?). That sounds at least to me like a more commonsense situation in florida...
So, it was her choice for the bar guards to be unarmed. Hmm. She almost sounds like a typical liberal, someone who actually drank the koolaid that other liberals served about how peaceful the world would be with “sensible” gun control (ie “no guns”)? Apparently she decided to implement her own private “sensible” gun control on her property, but it did no good because folks can always violate her no gun rule somehow. How many florida bar owners are like her, i wonder. And i wonder how she can talk about reopening if she is not going to change her no gun bar guard rule. Who would feel safe in her bar? Would it even be feasible to re-open the bar with her as owner, given the casualty count and the failure of her policy to provide security for her patrons? (I recall reading about her intent to re-open, and of course everyone needs some time to grieve for the victims, but still i wonder if anyone has been able to ask her hard questions such as these).
Anyway thanks, though still somewhat murky on some implementation details and implications...
That would be correct. She would however be liable for their actions as well as her own. Most clubs here that have issues hire outside security. BTW the Orlando shooter had a Florida G license (armed security)which meant he had to annually re-qualify with his 9mm.