Skip to comments.
Join a Conversation on the Assault Weapons Ban
whitehouse.gov ^
| 6/19/2016
| Unknown
Posted on 06/19/2016 9:12:18 AM PDT by rktman
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Here ya go. Finally a chance to get heard. Well, unless you have a PRO gun question or want to address the constant violations of the 2nd amendment by the govt. So, if you're feeling a little disoriented today, the time of the event is:
1:00 p.m. eastern
12:00 p.m central
11:00 a.m. mountain
10:00 a.m. pacific.
Let us know if anyone gets to participate.
1
posted on
06/19/2016 9:12:18 AM PDT
by
rktman
To: rktman
He’s not interested in listening to us.
2
posted on
06/19/2016 9:13:05 AM PDT
by
Tzimisce
To: rktman
“Conversation” implies a two-way communication. That’s hard to do when the receiver isn’t receiving.
3
posted on
06/19/2016 9:13:57 AM PDT
by
IronJack
To: rktman
No thanks. Let me know when you’re going to have a “conversation” on Muslim attacks on Americans and the uncontrolled invasion of America by people who want to kill us all.
4
posted on
06/19/2016 9:14:52 AM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(When was the last time you heard a celebrity say, If Trump wins, I'm moving to MEXICO!)
To: Tzimisce
Not to worry. The lyin’ king won’t be participating. The REAL shadow prez will be doing the Q&A. Gal pal val will be (as usual) running the show.
5
posted on
06/19/2016 9:15:36 AM PDT
by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
To: rktman
Valerie Jarrett? ROTFLMAO!!!
6
posted on
06/19/2016 9:16:02 AM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(When was the last time you heard a celebrity say, If Trump wins, I'm moving to MEXICO!)
To: rktman
My conversation is limited to 2 letters: N. O. Coneversation over.
7
posted on
06/19/2016 9:16:09 AM PDT
by
corlorde
To: rktman
To: Tzimisce
The Rainbow Mosque is a broken record.
9
posted on
06/19/2016 9:16:36 AM PDT
by
Paladin2
(auto spelchk? BWAhaha2haaa.....I aint't likely fixin' nuttin'. Blame it on the Bossa Nova...)
To: rktman
Lets call it what it is...Nationwide Gun grab attempt by a bunch of Islamic apologist Stalinists. This is nothing more than a dog-and-pony show for the lazy liberal media
10
posted on
06/19/2016 9:16:46 AM PDT
by
darkwing104
(Forgive but don't forget)
To: FlingWingFlyer
Dammit FlingWingFlyer you need to listen up. This has nothing, I repeat, NOTHING at all to do with moose limbs. LOL!
11
posted on
06/19/2016 9:17:22 AM PDT
by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
To: rktman
I think a famous one-word response would be apropos:
"NUTS"!
12
posted on
06/19/2016 9:19:37 AM PDT
by
Psalm 73
("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
To: FlingWingFlyer
Consider:
300+ millions population. 300+ million firearms. 32,000(?) gun deaths. More than half suicides. Boil down the numbers and were lookin statistically at something like what, 0.0001% chance youll die from a gunshot. Break it down even more for death by AR and the percentage is almost invisible. But, the libs care not one whit about that. If it goes BANG! and it’s loud, it’s bad. And, someone could put their eye out.
13
posted on
06/19/2016 9:20:28 AM PDT
by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
To: rktman; All
send ‘em this
make go viral
(love the look on the Washington gun=grabbers faces - cache this and keep it going - especially post/email it to every gun-grabber you know/see)
Challenge them to refute it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HGhPWH9kOxw
14
posted on
06/19/2016 9:22:06 AM PDT
by
maine-iac7
(A Christian is as a Christian does - "By their works...")
To: rktman
I submitted my question:
“If we must not blame all Mooslims for the actions of Omar Mateen, why is it OK to blame all gun owners for the actions of Omar Mateen?”
15
posted on
06/19/2016 9:22:40 AM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(If the Orlando terrorist doesnÂ’t represent all Muslims, why does he represent all gun-owners?)
To: rktman
I have heard about the “List.”
Hitler had a List.
Stalin had a List.
Mao had a list.
I vote no until I find out who in the hell runs the “List.”
16
posted on
06/19/2016 9:24:54 AM PDT
by
hadaclueonce
(This time it is serious.)
To: Tzimisce
It’s going to be a one sided “conversation”
17
posted on
06/19/2016 9:25:09 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: rktman
Mr, Terrorist in Chief, how would No Fly/No Buy have prevented September 11 (2,996), Oklahoma City (168), Orlando (49), San Bernadino (16), Fort Hood (13)?
18
posted on
06/19/2016 9:25:22 AM PDT
by
wizwor
To: rktman
Only one thing to say, really, ValJar. Ban them but anyone who doesn’t care about the law will still have them.
On that sad early Sunday morning, one week ago, there were thousands of “assault weapons” in this country. All of them were stored safely away except one, which was massacring people. Yes, all the many thousand assault rifles were obeying your laws except one. Maybe there is something off about depending on the laws to prevent lawbreakers.
19
posted on
06/19/2016 9:26:20 AM PDT
by
Yaelle
(Make America Safe Again)
To: hadaclueonce
A super secret court that doesn’t really exist and nobody knows is there?
20
posted on
06/19/2016 9:26:30 AM PDT
by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson