Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The World Economy Is Stagnating Like It’s 1937
New York Magazine ^ | June 17, 2016 | Eric Levitz

Posted on 06/18/2016 12:00:56 PM PDT by nickcarraway

A financial crisis sends the global economy into recession. The U.S. government responds with a fiscal and monetary stimulus. Growth recovers, and unemployment drops, but the debts and psychological scars of the downturn linger. Consumers repair their balance sheets instead of taking trips to the mall. Investors hoard their capital among fears of low demand. Everyone wants government bonds, pushing benchmark interests rates toward the zero-bound. Inflation remains tepid. Still, policymakers see enough signs of recovery to cut public spending and tighten monetary policy.

Is this a description of the economic landscape of 1937 or 2016? Economists at Morgan Stanley warn that the pattern describes both, and to avoid a repeat of 1938’s recession, the Federal Reserve must slam the brakes on raising interest rates, and the federal government must start running up the deficit.

“We think that the current macroeconomic environment has a number of significant similarities with the 1930s,” the financial firm’s global strategy team informs its clients in a recent memo. “The critical similarity between the 1930s and the 2008 cycle is that the financial shock and the relatively high levels of indebtedness changed the risk attitudes of the private sector and triggered them to repair their balance sheets.”

As MarketWatch notes, the private sector’s present risk aversion is evidenced by a recent Bank of America Merrill Lynch survey that showed investors hoarding cash at a nearly 15-year high.

"In 1936-37, the premature and sharp pace of tightening of policies led to a double-dip in the US economy, resulting in a relapse into recession and deflation in 1938," the Morgan Stanley team continued. "Similarly, in the current cycle, as growth recovered, policy-makers proceeded to tighten fiscal policy, which has contributed to a slowdown in growth in recent quarters."

Here, Morgan Stanley throws some shade at Federal Reserve chair Janet Yellen. In December, the central bank lifted interest rates for the first time in nine years, despite scant evidence that the economy was at risk of overheating. On Wednesday, the Federal Open Market Committee announced that it would hold interest rates steady for the moment, and slowed its plans for future increases.

But retaining low interest rates won’t be enough to counter the private sector’s ongoing reluctance to invest. Rather, the note argues that public spending will need to fill the gap.

"The sluggish private demand and weakening inflation expectations are signs that the repair process for the private sector's balance sheets is not yet complete," the economists write. "Activating fiscal policy, particularly at a time when the monetary policy stance is still accommodative, could lead to a virtuous cycle where the corporate sector takes up private investment, and sustains job creation and income growth.”

Interest rates are low, and inflation is weak. There are millions of Americans unemployed or underemployed, and wage growth isn’t where we’d like it to be. And we’ve got roads to fix, bridges to build, and airports to renovate from sea to shining sea. Even Morgan Stanley and Larry Summers are saying we need to run up the deficit. Last time we were in this mess, it took a world war to get us back on track. Rebuilding our nation’s infrastructure shouldn’t be too much to ask.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: economy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 06/18/2016 12:00:56 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway; SunkenCiv; Nachum; narses; SJackson

Duh.
Maybe because the “world’s” Keynesian economic advisors and socialist-trained and socialist/communist-dominated politicians are ACTING with the same politics and economic policies that failed between 1929-1948 .....

Then again, does Obola really want the Western capitalist democracies and their economic systems to survive his policies?


2 posted on 06/18/2016 12:07:58 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Oh yeah, more deficit spending. That’s the ticket.


3 posted on 06/18/2016 12:09:13 PM PDT by Paladin2 (auto spelchk? BWAhaha2haaa.....I aint't likely fixin' nuttin'. Blame it on the Bossa Nova...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

22,600 new rules and regulations by the Current President such as to choke off the economy. The USA could get back to work if the Gov. Would allow it.


4 posted on 06/18/2016 12:10:33 PM PDT by Trumpet 1 (US Constitution is my guide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

Well, WWII finally got things going in the US. Maybe we should start WWIII against Islam?


5 posted on 06/18/2016 12:11:03 PM PDT by Paladin2 (auto spelchk? BWAhaha2haaa.....I aint't likely fixin' nuttin'. Blame it on the Bossa Nova...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Rebuilding our nation’s infrastructure shouldn’t be too much to ask.


No, I doesn’t, except that we recently spend a TRILLION dollars for shovel-ready jobs. Unless, of course, the president is a lying bag of maggots.


6 posted on 06/18/2016 12:14:28 PM PDT by sparklite2 ( "The white man is the Jew of Liberal Fascism." -Jonah Goldberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sparklite2

The liberal view is that Porkulus failed to meet the objectives, because evil Republicans held it down to a trillion dollars, and wouldn’t let the Democrats spend more.

To them, the problem is that we just didn’t spend enough money with Porkulus to solve the problem.


7 posted on 06/18/2016 12:20:19 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Stop the ever tightening requirements on banks, it's crushing loan demand and economic growth.

Cut 20% of Federal regs a year, repeal Obamacare and end green energy mandates/subsidies.

Cut corporate tax rates to 20%.

8 posted on 06/18/2016 12:20:27 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot ("Telling the government to lower trade barriers to zero...is government interference" central_va)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

9 posted on 06/18/2016 12:21:38 PM PDT by Rufii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Tweren’t WWII by itself. It was FDR relaxing the regulatory stranglehold on bidness so they could rev up production to save his ass.

His counterpart, however, helps arm America’s enemies, not her friends.


10 posted on 06/18/2016 12:26:57 PM PDT by FirstFlaBn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2; SunkenCiv; Nachum

There are some good reasons to think it wasn’t really WWII “US government spending” (the original Keynesian claims) but the European “gold-backed” defense money that THEY spent over here that kick-started the US economy.

remember, it is not so much the immediate payment that causes a business to begin hiring to begin product, but the PROMISE of payment from a new contract that is in-hand.


11 posted on 06/18/2016 12:28:04 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

It’s coming, unfortunately.


12 posted on 06/18/2016 12:41:46 PM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FirstFlaBn

The US also began rearming in 1940, will lend-lease shipments expanded. So even before Pearl Harbor demand was rising and factory utilization was up.


13 posted on 06/18/2016 12:44:17 PM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

94 million out of work you get recession 7 1/2 years of Obama&Co on the march and the fools thinks Hillary can make a change dreamers.


14 posted on 06/18/2016 12:44:31 PM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

The elites and politicians believe that the free market is to blame. There will be no stopping them until smashed-head-human-jump.


15 posted on 06/18/2016 1:36:03 PM PDT by deadrock (I is someone else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaduz

“94 million out of work you get recession 7 1/2 years of Obama&Co on the march and the fools thinks Hillary can make a change dreamers.”

Add to that tens of millions of illegal invaders taking jobs at under the going rate and sending their earnings back to Mexico, all the while taking taxpayer money through all the entitlement programs to pay for their living expenses.


16 posted on 06/18/2016 1:41:47 PM PDT by Carthego delenda est
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

In 1938 the USA had an industrial base so all comparisons to today’s economy are false.


17 posted on 06/18/2016 1:53:24 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

mark


18 posted on 06/18/2016 2:46:41 PM PDT by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken! - vote Trump 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
We would be better off with a Keynesian in office. We don't have that. The GOP and Dems aren't even somewhat responsible. At least Keynes thought we should have surplus in times of good. Keynes favored deficit spending only to combat depressions, not to fight low levels of unemployment. He never suggested long term .gov spending as it is now, nor a large national debt that we have today under the current parties.
19 posted on 06/18/2016 3:06:28 PM PDT by Theoria (I should never have surrendered. I should have fought until I was the last man alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Considering how badly the United States lost World War II, not a good idea.


20 posted on 06/18/2016 6:26:55 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson