This was the last story published by the WaPo that I believed.
This was the last story published by the WaPo that I believed.
Looks like the WaPost is whistling in the dark.
This would be the same Hillary who has solicited millions of dollars from terrorist supporting middle east islamist countries?
WaPo is mad because Trump revoked their press credentials to his events and they now have no access. This is their lame response.
Donald Trump is so going to kick Hillary!’s saggy backside around the block.
We learned all we needed to know about Clintoon’s “hawkishness” during her infamous “Stand Down at Benghazi”. She’s a chickensh*t corrupt politician. Geez.
My letter to the LA Times, which will not be published.
Re: Editorial Trump’s innuendo a new low (The Times will not allow articles unless they reference a Times story or editorial. Also they are rabidly anti-trump and pro-Clinton and Imam Obama and yes, i see it free at breakfast downtown)
Ok, let’s dispense with innuendo. Trump made one of the strongest national defense statements in the last 53 years (Cuban Missile Crisis). Obama is very weak on terrorism. Droning leaders and sporadic low level bombing are only small steps and new leaders emerge. He released terrorists when they are still waging declared war on us and our allies and when attacks continue. He refuses to even name the obvious common thread, radical Islam. Even Clinton admits it now that Trump prodded her into it.
Obama relishes open borders and welcomes immigrants from terrorist areas when his administrators admit those countries can’t provide sufficient document to do “thorough screening.” He supported a misnamed Arab Spring and destabilized several counties as radicals and terrorists gained power in those countries. He failed to respond to an attack on our Ambassador and protect a missile shipment. He turns a blind eye to the largest national supporter of terrorism, Iran, in their development of a nuclear weapon. He hides information indicating the Saudi officials lent support to the 9-11 terrorists.
When asked about ISIS 3 years ago, he said that the Pentagon, after two years, was still working on a plan of attack. I made my decision, before this week, that I could not vote for Clinton and now I am sure that I will be voting for the strongest candidate for our national defense, Donald Trump. If anything, Trump’s statement could have been stronger.
Lastly, the Times refuses to make public the recording of Obama’s statement at a dinner in LA which might have cost him the election in 2008. As Bush said, you’re either for us or your for the terrorists. Trump is for us and it’s time for you to step up.
They should have interviewed Ambassador Stevens to confirm how tough she is on national security. Oh, wait....
Any mention of her 500% increase in immigrant Jihadis?
Not really. To little, to late.
The Washington Post is openly shilling for Hillary.
Good to know their dishonesty and partisanship have plumbed a new low.
Keep it up!
Personal ... email ... server ... with ... classified ... data ... unprotected.
WaPo ... you're all idiots.
If there’s big money to be made, Hillary is interested in it.
If there is big money to be made by Hillary in using US forces to overthrow a foreign government, like Libya, then she is interested in it.
When her thieving actions result in Americans being killed, like at Benghazi, then she isn’t interested in it and she runs to her bedroom to hide under the covers.
Washington has zero credibility
Mr Hohman, put down that jug of kool-aid before writing crap like this. To say this woman is a defense hawk is a joke and to say she’s been scrutinized as a public official is an even bigger joke. If she had been given just one ounce of scrutiny in her public life by the media she would be nothing more than an angry feminist lawyer at this point in her life.
And they wonder why Trump kicked them out?
Amazing Jeff Bezos bought that worthless newspaper to use as a propaganda machine.
He bought it to protect his empire and spew his political views.
Hillaryous. The willing suspension of disbelief.
Hilda Beast has been extremely hawkish in attacking foreign dictators in Libya, Syria, Egypt etc which is why the middle-east is a huge mess.
On the other hand, Hilda would not utter the words “radical Islam” until goaded by Trump yesterday. Hilda is operating strictly as a politically correct orator domestically, which is why slaughter of innocent Americans at the hands of Radical Islamists will continue until she is removed from the scene.
Wappo. Spinnasters.