1 posted on
06/13/2016 11:43:20 AM PDT by
george76
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
To: george76
2 posted on
06/13/2016 11:44:07 AM PDT by
Westbrook
(Children do not divide your love, they multiply it)
To: george76
To: george76
My finger is not that fast...../s
4 posted on
06/13/2016 11:44:52 AM PDT by
Lurkinanloomin
(Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
To: george76
“If [Mr. Mateen] was not able to buy a weapon that shoots off 700 rounds in a minute, a lot of those people would still be alive,” the congressman said. Like in Paris France?
5 posted on
06/13/2016 11:45:17 AM PDT by
GregoTX
To: george76
Oh yeah. Well, I say it can fire a million rounds a minute.
So I win
6 posted on
06/13/2016 11:45:52 AM PDT by
AppyPappy
(If you really want to irritate someone, point out something obvious they are trying hard to ignore.)
To: george76
If a couple of those homosexuals had their own guns perhaps things would have been a tad different. In a hetero club that doesn’t have a magnetic screener at the door it is a safe bet that in a crowd of that size more than one or two will be armed, gunfree zone notwithstanding, with or without a carry permit.
8 posted on
06/13/2016 11:46:31 AM PDT by
arthurus
To: george76
>> the worst mass shooting in U.S. history.
Second worst. The US Government still holds the record for Wounded Knee.
9 posted on
06/13/2016 11:47:16 AM PDT by
Bryanw92
(If we had some ham, we could have ham and eggs, if we had some eggs.)
To: george76
This lying piece of crap. I cannot shoot 700 rounds a minute. Damn stupid Democrat.
To: george76
If [Mr. Mateen] was not able to buy a weapon that shoots off 700 rounds in a minute, a lot of those people would still be alive,”
CNN’s Erin Burnett then replied, “You’re right about that.”
Dumb and Dumber.
11 posted on
06/13/2016 11:47:44 AM PDT by
McGruff
(How about investigating the donations to the Clinton Foundation)
To: george76
I think Grayson is confusing the AR-15 with his fists.
To: george76
an M4 (operated by a government agent) will fire a 700+ rounds/min, but not a civilian owned AR.
14 posted on
06/13/2016 11:49:47 AM PDT by
Ouderkirk
(To the left, everything must evidence that this or that strand of leftist theory is true)
To: george76
That’d be one tired finger.
To: george76
Now I really want one, but I’ll have to sell the house for ammo.
17 posted on
06/13/2016 11:50:31 AM PDT by
867V309
(It's over. It's over now.)
To: george76
To: george76
A magazine that would be able to hold 700 rounds might make the AR a little cumbersome to shoot./s
19 posted on
06/13/2016 11:51:05 AM PDT by
cork
(Gun control = hitting what you aim at)
To: george76
20 posted on
06/13/2016 11:51:25 AM PDT by
Rome2000
(SMASH THE CPUSA-SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS-CLOSE ALL MOSQUES)
To: george76
Piker. I can shoot 701. That’s 23 mag changes. No sweat.
To: george76
22 posted on
06/13/2016 11:52:19 AM PDT by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: george76
Gotta have the super extra 700 round extended magazine for that.
23 posted on
06/13/2016 11:52:26 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: george76
Homecorpse must have been the mag-changing champion of the world.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson